Tribunals and CommissionsSingle Bench(2020) 06 NCLT CK 2314

Union Bank vs Maharashtra Shetkari Sugar

National Company Law Tribunal · Decided on 15 June 2020

HON’BLE JUDGES
B.S.V. Prakash Kumar, Actg. President
CASE NUMBER
(IB)-1767/MB/2017

CourtKutchehry membership

More clarity. Every judgment.

Download court copies, explore connected cases and make more of every research session.

Loading membership options…

CourtKutchehry membership

More clarity. Every judgment.

Download court copies, explore connected cases and make more of every research session.

Loading membership options…

Ask AI about this case

AI Structured Summary

Not yet generated for this judgment

Judgment

5 paragraphs · 217 words

Heard and dictated in open court

IA-960/2020:-

It is an application filed before this Bench for condonation of delay/extension of time to file e-form RoC INC-28 for he failed to file it in time. It appears that as per Section 460 of the Companies Act, 2013, in case any document is required to be filed before RoC under any of the provisions of this Act, if is not filed within the time specified therein, the person seeking condonation for delay shall apply to the Central Government giving reasons for condonation of delay. Further there being an explicit provision for condonation of delay with regard to the applications to be filed before RoC, this applicant shall approach the respective Competent Authority seeking condonation of delay for late filing, but not filing an application before this Bench citing Rule 15 read with Rule 153 under NCLT Rules, 2016. For this reason, this Bench cannot pass any order by looking at NCLT Rule, especially when an explicit section of law is set out in the Companies Act conferring this right upon some other Authority.

Therefore, by virtue of the logic as well as the law stated above, this application shall be filed before the respective Competent Authority, but not before this Bench.

Accordingly, the present application is dismissed as misconceived.