Tribunals and CommissionsDivision Bench(2022) 06 NCLT CK 0491

Union Bank of India vs Nisha Purushothaman

National Company Law Tribunal, Chennai · Decided on 20 June 2022

HON’BLE JUDGES
Justice (Retd.) S. Ramathilagam, Member (Judicial) · Anil Kumar B, Member (Technical)
CASE NUMBER
CP/72/IB/2021

CourtKutchehry membership

More clarity. Every judgment.

Download court copies, explore connected cases and make more of every research session.

Loading membership options…

CourtKutchehry membership

More clarity. Every judgment.

Download court copies, explore connected cases and make more of every research session.

Loading membership options…

Ask AI about this case

AI Structured Summary

Not yet generated for this judgment

Judgment

11 paragraphs · 436 words

Per: ANIL KUMAR B, MEMBER (TECHNICAL)

These applications have been filed under Section 95 (1) of the Insolvency and Bankruptcy Code, 2016 against the personal guarantors of Empee Distilleries Limited, the Corporate Debtor.

2.

The present application is filed by the Financial Creditor viz. Union Bank of India against the personal guarantors of the Corporate Debtor.

3.

It is stated in Part – III of the Application that demand was made on the personal guarantor on 17.10.2020. It is also seen from Part – III at Sl. No. 13 of the Application that the Personal Guarantor has executed the Deed of Guarantee on 08.02.2016. The said Deed of guarantee is enclosed along with the typed set filed along with the Application.

4.

The Demand Notice which was issued under Rule 7(1) of the Insolvency and Bankruptcy (Application to Adjudicating Authority for Insolvency Resolution Process for Personal Guarantors to Corporate Debtors) Rules, 2019 to the Personal Guarantor on 17.10.2020 is also placed on record

5.

The Financial Creditor has also placed on file the CRILIC Report dated 02.01.2019. Hence, on this term, the present Petition is filed to initiate proceeding in terms of Section 95 (1) of the IBC, 2016, against the Respondent herein.

6.

The Hon’ble NCLAT, Principal Bench, in the matter of Mr. Ravi Ajit Kulkarni –Vs- State Bank of India in Company Appeal (AT) (Insolvency) No. 316 of 2021 has held in para 42 that once an Application under Section 95 of IBC, 2016 is filed, the Adjudicating Authority has to act on it, and following principles of natural justice, give limited notice to Personal Guarantor to appear referring to the Interim Moratorium that has commenced as per terms of Section 96 and subsequently proceed to the next stage of appointing Resolution Professional as per Section 97 read with attendant Rules and Regulations

7.

Accordingly, we hereby appoint Mr. Madhu Desikan having Registration No.: IBBI/IPA-001/IP-P00579/2017-2018/11021 (email id:- [email protected]) as the Interim Resolution Professional in respect of the Personal Guarantor.

8.

The Financial Creditor is also directed to serve a copy of this Application to the Interim Resolution Professional for preparing the Report under Section 99 of IBC, 2016.

9.

The Resolution Professional is required to examine the Application as set out in Section 97(6) of IBC, 2016 and after examining the Application, as per Section 97(7) of IBC, 2016 the Resolution Professional may recommend for the acceptance or rejection of the Application in his report, within a period of 10 days as contemplated under Section 99(1) of IBC, 2016.

10.

Post this matter on 26.07.2022 for filing of Report by the Interim Resolution Professional.