Tribunals and CommissionsSingle Bench(2019) 10 NCDRC CK 0085

Unihomes-3 People Welfare Association vs M/S. Unitech Limited

National Consumer Disputes Redressal Commission · Decided on 30 October 2019

HON’BLE JUDGES
V.K. Jain, Presiding Member
RESULT
Disposed Of
CASE NUMBER
Consumer Case No. 570 Of 2018

CourtKutchehry membership

More clarity. Every judgment.

Download court copies, explore connected cases and make more of every research session.

Loading membership options…

Ask AI about this case

AI Structured Summary

Not yet generated for this judgment

Judgment

292 paragraphs · 1,454 words

V.K.Jain, Presiding Member

1.

This is a complaint instituted under Section 12(1)(b) of the Consumer Protection Act on behal many as 38 allottees of residential flats in a project namely 'Unihomes-3 Noida' which the OP was t in Sector-113 of Noida. As per the allotment letters issued to the above referred 38 persons on diffe the possession of the allotted flats was to be delivered to them within 30/36 months from the date of The particulars of the allotments made to the above referred 38 persons, the payments made by them date by which possession was to be delivered to them, are as under:

Personal Details          Flat Details

S. No.

Name

Uni3 Customer Id

Uni3 Flat Number

Uni 3 Tower #

Allotment Date

Possession Date

1.

Abhishek Das s/o Dr Bishwanath Das & Ankita Jain w/o Abhishek Das

UE 1590

705

C6

25-10-12

25-10-15

2.

Aman Bharadwaj s/o Vinod Kumar

UE1748

704

D1

30/01/2013

02-01-16

3.

Amit Sehgal s/o Inderjeet Sehgal

UE1493

907

C5

21/9/2012

21/9/2015

4.

Ankit Goel s/o Inder Kumar Gupta

UE0039

603

A2

13/12/11

13/06/14

5.

Anoop Kumar Goyal s/o Vimal Agarwal & Divya Goyal w/o Anoop Kumar Goyal

UE1616

207

C6

30/10/2012

30/10/2015

6.

Anubhav Verma s/o P K Verma & Priti Verma w/o Anubhav Verma

UE0590

601

B4

25/2/2012

25/2/2015

7.

Anurag Bahl s/o Prem Prakash Bahl & Suchitra Dalal Bahl w/o Anurag Bahl

UE0346

1207

A3

11-01-12

12-07-14

8.

Bodhraj Keswani s/o Sheeru Wadhumal Keswani

UE1345

1201

A6

24/8/2012

24/8/2015

9.

Charu Mittal w/o Anshul Agarwal & Krishna Kumar Agarwal s/o Shanti Swaroop Goyal

UE0089

401

A2

24/12/2011

23/06/2014

10.

Debanjan Banerjee s/o Dr Nirmal Kumar Banerjee & Nabonita Bagchi Banerjee w/o Debanjan Banerjee

UE0524

803

B4

15-02-12

15-02-15

11.

Jyoti Sabharwal w/o P Kasturi Rangan & P Kasturi Rangan s/o N Paramathma

UE1793

1207

D1

26/12/2012

25/12/2015

12.

Manoj Kumar s/o Chandan Kumar

UE1805

906

C4

27-12-12

27-12-15

13.

Mohit Garg s/o Manmohan Garg

UE1233A

0005

C1

07-07-12

07-07-15

14.

Naveen Kumar s/o Shyam Lal

UE 1845

804

C-6

04-01-13

04-01-16

15.

Neeraj Kumar s/o Sajjan Kumar & Kavita Gahlot w/o Neeraj Kumar

UE1189

1004

C3

07-03-12

07-03-15

16.

Nitin Girotra s/o Ashok Girotra & Priyanka Girotra w/o Nitin Girotra

UE1874

803

D1

23-01-13

22-01-16

17.

Om Prakash Gupta s/o Durga Prasad Gupta & Prabha Gupta w/o O P Gupta

UE0150

208

A4

31/12/11

31/12/14

18.

Pawan Kumar Jain s/o N C Jain

UE1204

1002

B4

02-07-12

02-07-15

19.

Rajesh Bhambani s/o O P Bhambani

UE0438

103

B1

06-02-12

06-08-14

20.

Rajesh Kumar s/o Ram Brat Gope & Anamika Anupam w/o Rajesh Kumar

UE1434

902

B4

05-09-12

05-09-15

21.

Rajlaxmi Rout w/o Santanu Kumar Patra

UE0392

705

A5

05-03-14

05-09-16

22.

Rita Devi w/o Mahendra Singh Bhargava & Mahendra Singh Bhargava s/o L S Bhargava

UE0372

204

B1

28-01-12

28-07-14

23.

Sandeep Sharma s/o Satnarain Gautam & Satnarain Gautam s/o Jainarain

UE0250

304

A6

09-01-12

09-01-15

24.

Sanjay Sharma s/o J M Sharma

UE0382

608

B1

25-01-12

24-07-14

25.

Sanjay Kumar Sharma s/o Shukdeo Sharma

UE 1062

102

C1

20-06-12

20-06-15

26.

Sanjiv Kumar Gupta s/o Rajendra Prasad Gupta & Ritu Gupta w/o Sanjiv Kumar Gupta

UE1618

103

C 6

02-11-12

01-11-15

27.

Saurabh Gupta s/o Anil Kumar Gupta

UE1938

1106

C6

20/2/2013

20/2/2016

28.

Saurabh Nautiyal s/o Krishna Nand Nautiyal & Shubhangi Nautiyal w/o Saurabh Nautiyal

UE1208

0006

C3

02-07-12

02-07-15

29.

Smita Bhagat w/o Pranshuman Roy & Pranshuman Roy s/o Jian Prasad Roy

UE0710

807

B1

10-04-12

10-04-15

30.

Sumit Agarwal s/o Laxmi Narayan Agarwa

UE1749

701

D1

20-12-12

20-12-15

31.

Sumit Kumar s/o Krishan Kumar

UE1943

1005

C3

26/02/13

25/02/16

32.

Sumit Vaid s/o Baldev Raj Vaid & Raj Kumari w/o Baldev Raj Vaid & Jyoti Sharma w/o Sumit Vaid

UE0313

306

A5

11-01-2012

11-01-2015

33.

Sunita Khullar w/o Inder jit Khullar & Vineet Khullar s/o Inder Jit Khullar

UE1891

5

C6

27/01/13

27/01/16

34.

Tarun Thakur s/o Rajesh Thakr & Anita Thakur w/o Tarun Thakur

UE0026

702

A01

12-12-11

12-06-14

35.

Vaibhav Chaturvedi s/o Prabhat Chaturvedi & Rekha Chaturvedi w/o Prabhat Chaturvedi

UE0375

0306

B1

28/1/2012

28/7/2014

36.

Varun Dixit s/o Suresh Chandra Dixit

UE1782

806

D1

26-12-12

25-12-15

37.

Vikas Saraswat s/o Virendra Nath & Geeta Saraswat w/o Vikas Saraswat

UE1741

807

D1

19-12-12

19-12-15

38.

Jyoti Agarwal w/o Vikas Kumar & Vikas Kumar s/o Ashok Kumar

UE0453

406

A5

06-02-12

06-08-14

2.

The grievance of the above referred allottees is that the possession of the allotted flat has not e offered to them despite they having made substantial payment to the OP. Therefore, they are before Commission through the Complainant Association seeking refund of the amount paid by them to the alongwith compensation etc.

3.

The OP did not file its written version within the prescribed period of 30 days from the receipt On an application filed by the OP, the delay in filing the written version was condoned vide order da 10.08.2018 subject to payment of Rs.10,000/- as cost with the Legal Aid Account of NCDRC within weeks from the date of the order. However, the cost was not deposited and therefore, the right of the its written version was closed vide order dated 20.09.2018. No request was made by the OP thereaft permission to deposit the cost at a belated stage. As a result, the order closing its right to file the wri version became final.

4.

I have heard the learned counsel for the parties and have considered the affidavits filed by the complainants by way of evidence. The learned counsel for the complainant submits that they have f affidavits of all the 38 allottees on whose behalf this complaint is instituted alongwith their respectiv supporting documents.

5.

A perusal of the Certificate of Registration issued by Registrar of Societies (South East), Gove NCT of Delhi would show that the complainant is registered as a society under the provisions of the Registration Act, 1860. Some of the objectives of the complainant association, as contained in its Memorandum of Association, read as under:

MAIN OBJECTIVES

1.

To protect the collective interest of the registered members of the association by representing members at relevant in forums/commissions and courts.

2.

To protect interest of the members by representing the Association at various relevant Forums Commissions, Courts, appropriate Government, quasi Government, Judicial, Statutory and ot relevant bodies, including local municipal bodies, authorities, builders, developer, association builders & developers and other organization which may impact the members monetarily or o and take all such steps as may be necessary in this regard.

3.

To pursue; propagate, advance, safeguard or promote the interests of members of the associat are the buyers/owners/allottees of Residential flats in project - UNIHOMES 3, SECTOR-113, UTTAR PRADESH.

From the Registration Certificate and the aims and objectives of the complainant society, I am that the complainant is a Voluntary Consumer Association within the meaning of Section 12 of the C Protection Act and therefore, is competent to institute this Complaint on behalf of the said allottees.

6.

A perusal of the details recorded hereinbefore would show that the possession of the allotted fl be delivered on different dates in the years 2014, 2015 and 2016. Since the possession of the allotte not even been offered to the above referred 38 allottees, they are entitled to refund of the amount pai to the OP alongwith appropriate compensation in the form of interest.

7.

During the course of arguments, I asked the learned counsel for the OP as to what is the stage o construction of the flats allotted to the above referred 38 persons. She submits that the construction complete and at present, the company is not in a position to resume the construction.

8.

The learned counsel for the complainant has relied upon the decision of this Commission dated 08.05.2019 in Consumer Complaint No.939 of 2016 Unitech Welfare Society Vs. Unitech Limit pertains to the allotment of residential flats in this very project. A perusal of the above referred deci show that this Commission directed refund of the amount paid by the allottees who were the membe complainant society alongwith simple interest @ 10% per annum from the date of each payment.

9.

For the reasons stated hereinabove, the complaint is disposed of with the following directions:

1.

The OP shall refund the entire amount received by it from the above referred 38 allottees of re flats in the project namely 'Unihomes-3 Noida' alongwith compensation to them in the form o interest @ 10% per annum from the date of each payment till the date of refund.

2.

The OP shall pay a sum of Rs.25,000/- as the cost of litigation to the complainant.

3.

The payment in terms of this order shall be made within three months from today.