High CourtsDivision Bench(2001) 07 UK CK 0006

Umesh Kumar Pahwa vs Board of Directors, Nainital, Almora Kshetriya Gramin Bank and Another

Uttarakhand High Court · Decided on 2 July 2001 · Citation: (2002) 1 LLJ 768

HON’BLE JUDGES
P.C. Verma, J · M.C. Jain, J
CASE NUMBER
C.M.W.P. No. 166 of 2001

CourtKutchehry membership

More clarity. Every judgment.

Download court copies, explore connected cases and make more of every research session.

Loading membership options…

CourtKutchehry membership

More clarity. Every judgment.

Download court copies, explore connected cases and make more of every research session.

Loading membership options…

Ask AI about this case

AI Structured Summary

Not yet generated for this judgment

Judgment

2 paragraphs · 190 words
1.

This writ petition has been filed by the petitioner seeking a writ of certiorari for quashing the punishment order dated June 22, 1999 and the appellate order dated May 6, 2000, by which the petitioner has been awarded punishment of degrading him in pay-scale and excluding the of period of suspension as not spent on duty. Admittedly, the copy of the inquiry report was not supplied to the petitioner. Learned counsel for the respondent-Bank informed that the copy of inquiry report was supplied to the petitioner after the punishment order was passed. It is thus admitted that before the passing of the impugned order, copy of inquiry report was not supplied to the petitioner. Therefore, in view of the law laid down by the Supreme Court in the case of Union of India and others Vs. Mohd. Ramzan Khan, and subsequently endorsed in the case of Managing Director, ECIL, Hyderabad, Vs. Karunakar, etc. etc., , the punishment was unwarranted. Thus, the order of punishment is hereby quashed. However, it is open to the respondents to proceed afresh according to law.

2.

The petition is accordingly disposed of. Ordered accordingly.