Tribunals and CommissionsDivision Bench(2025) 10 ITAT CK 2462

Umar Mohd. vs ITO

Income Tax Appellate Tribunal, New Delhi · Decided on 30 October 2025

HON’BLE JUDGES
S. Rifaur Rahman, Accountant Member · Anubhav Sharma, Judicial Member
CASE NUMBER
ITAs No.2389 to 2392/Del/2025

CourtKutchehry membership

More clarity. Every judgment.

Download court copies, explore connected cases and make more of every research session.

Loading membership options…

CourtKutchehry membership

More clarity. Every judgment.

Download court copies, explore connected cases and make more of every research session.

Loading membership options…

Ask AI about this case

AI Structured Summary

Not yet generated for this judgment

Judgment

9 paragraphs · 264 words

PER ANUBHAV SHARMA, JM:

These are appeals preferred by the Assessee against the orders of the Ld. First Appellate Authority in appeals filed before him against the orders of the ld. Assessing Officer (hereinafter referred to as the Ld. AO, for short). Further details of the orders of the lower authorities are as under:-

ITA No. & Assessment YearCIT(A) [ld. FAA] who passed the orderAppeal No. & Date of order of the CIT(A)AO who passed the assessment order & Date of orderSection of the IT Act under which the AO passed the order
2389/Del/2025 2017-18CIT(A)-3, GurgaonCIT(A), GGN-1/10975/2019-20,ITO, Ward-4(4), Gurgaon. dated143(3)
Dated 10.02.202506.12.2019
2390/Del/2025 2018-19- Do-NFAC/2017-18/10229003, dated 10.02.2025AO, NeAC, dated 24.03.2021- Do -
2391/Del/2025 2018-19- Do-NFAC/2017-18/10229805 dated 10.02.2025AO, NeAC, dated 11.01.2022272A(1)(d)
2392/Del/2025 2018-19- Do-NFAC/10229804, dated 10.02.2025AO, NeAC, dated 14.01.2022270A
2.

On hearing both the sides and appreciating the material on record, we find that the assessee was not represented at the time of hearing and the appeal was dismissed on the basis that the assessee has failed to appear and file the submissions. The assessee has raised specific ground that he was not given opportunity to contest on merits. The impugned orders do not reflect as to if the notices were served to the knowledge of the assessee. Thus for ends of justice, without prolonging the matter further, we consider it an appropriate case to restore the issues on merits as well as on law to the files of the ld.CIT(A) with the direction to serve a notice afresh and decide the appeals in accordance with the law. The appeals are allowed for statistical purposes.