High CourtsDivision Bench(1913) 07 CAL CK 0040

Uma Singh and Others vs Rai Tarini Prosad Bahadur

Calcutta High Court · Decided on 1 July 1913 · Citation: AIR 1914 Cal 799 : 25 Ind. Cas. 532

HON’BLE JUDGES
Lawrence Jenkins, C.J · Asutosh Mookerjee, J

CourtKutchehry membership

More clarity. Every judgment.

Download court copies, explore connected cases and make more of every research session.

Loading membership options…

Ask AI about this case

AI Structured Summary

Not yet generated for this judgment

Judgment

2 paragraphs · 142 words
1.

It appears to us that this is really a very simple case and one which we can dispose of very briefly. If once it be held that the Court was entitled to make the presumption permitted, though not made obligatory, by Sub-section (6), it follows that the rent is one to be determined by reference to the area and is not a consolidated rent. The first point, therefore, to determine is whether the Court was entitled to make the presumption; we think it was. If that be so, we think there is an end of the case because it supports the conclusion that the rent was not consolidated but one to be determined by reference to the area. The area has been found and justifies the conclusion of the lower Appellate Court.

2.

We must, therefore, dismiss the appeal with costs.