High CourtsSingle Bench(2024) 01 DEL CK 3895

Uday Singtha vs The State Govt Of NCT Of Delhi & Anr.

Delhi High Court · Decided on 16 January 2024

HON’BLE JUDGES
Anoop Kumar Mendiratta, J
RESULT
Disposed Of
CASE NUMBER
CRL.M.C. 368/2024

CourtKutchehry membership

More clarity. Every judgment.

Download court copies, explore connected cases and make more of every research session.

Loading membership options…

CourtKutchehry membership

More clarity. Every judgment.

Download court copies, explore connected cases and make more of every research session.

Loading membership options…

Ask AI about this case

AI Structured Summary

Not yet generated for this judgment

Judgment

9 paragraphs · 397 words

ANOOP KUMAR MENDIRATTA, J (ORAL)

1.

Petition under Section 482 of the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 (‘Cr.P.C.’) has been preferred on behalf of the petitioner for quashing of FIR No. 16/2013 under Sections 498A/406/34 IPC read with Section 4 of DP Act registered at P.S.: Mansarover Park, Delhi and proceedings emanating therefrom.

2.

Issue notice. Learned APP for the State and learned counsel for respondent No. 2 alongwith respondent No. 2 in person appear on advance notice and accept notice.

3.

In brief, as per the case of the petitioner, marriage between petitioner and respondent No. 2 was solemnized according to Hindu rites and ceremonies on 02.03.2009. A female child was born out of the wedlock on 17.05.2011. Due to temperamental differences, respondent No. 2 and petitioner could not live together and have been living separately. On CRL.M.C. 368/2024 Page 1 of 2 complaint of respondent No. 2, present FIR was registered.

4.

The matter is stated to have been amicably resolved between the parties in terms of settlement deed dated 07.06.2016. The marriage between petitioner and respondent No. 2 is stated to have been dissolved by decree of divorce by way of mutual consent under Section 13B(2) of the Hindu Marriage Act.

5.

Learned APP for the State submits that in view of amicable settlement between the parties, the State has no objection in case the FIR in question is quashed.

6.

Petitioner as well as respondent No. 2 are present in-person in the Court today and have been identified by SI Yogesh, PS: Mansarover Park, Delhi. I have interacted with the parties and they confirm that the matter has been amicably settled between them without any threat, pressure or coercion. Respondent No. 2 also states that nothing remains to be further adjudicated upon between the parties and she has no objection in case the FIR in question is quashed.

7.

Considering the facts and circumstances, since the matter has been amicably settled between the parties, no useful purpose shall be served by keeping the case pending. It would be nothing but an abuse of the process of Court. Consequently, FIR No. 16/2013 under Sections 498A/406/34 IPC read with Section 4 of DP Act registered at P.S.: Mansarover Park, Delhi and proceedings emanating therefrom stand quashed.

Petition is accordingly disposed of. A copy of this order be forwarded to the concerned Trial Court for information.