High CourtsSingle Bench(2011) 06 MAD CK 0042

Tvl. M.M. Detergents Company (P) Ltd. vs The Commissioner of Geology and Mining and The District Collector

Madras High Court · Decided on 17 June 2011

HON’BLE JUDGES
M. Jaichandren, J
CASE NUMBER
Writ Petition No. 13082 of 2011

CourtKutchehry membership

More clarity. Every judgment.

Download court copies, explore connected cases and make more of every research session.

Loading membership options…

Ask AI about this case

AI Structured Summary

Not yet generated for this judgment

Judgment

16 paragraphs · 297 words

M. Jaichandren, J.—Heard the learned Counsels appearing for the Petitioner, as well as the Respondents.

2.

By consent of both the parties, the writ petition is taken up for final hearing and disposal.

3.

At this stage of the hearing of the writ petition, the learned Counsel appearing on behalf of the Petitioner had submitted that it would suffice, if

the second Respondent is directed to dispose of the representation, dated 14.6.2011, with regard to the request of the Petitioner for processing

the application relating to the grant of mining lease in his patta lands in S.F. No. 155/5A, 157/1 and 157/2, in Panniamalai Village, Natham Taluk,

Dindigul District.

4.

The learned Special Government Pleader appearing on behalf of the Respondents, has no objection for such an order being passed by this

Court.

5.

In view of the submissions made by the learned Counsels appearing on either side, the second Respondent is directed dispose of the

representation, dated 14.6.2011, with regard to the request of the Petitioner for processing the application relating to the grant of mining lease in

his patta lands in S.F. No. 155/5A, 157/1 and 157/2, in Panniamalai Village, Natham Taluk, Dindigul District. However, no final order shall be

passed, till the disposal of the writ petition, in W.P. No. 15574 of 2003, filed by the Petitioner challenging the notification issued by the first

Respondent, in G.S.R.329(E), dated 10.4.2003, amending the Mineral Concession Rules, 1960. The Petitioner is directed to furnish a copy of the

representation, dated 14.6.2011, to the second Respondent, along with a copy of this order. However, it is made clear that this Court, by this

order, has not expressed any opinion on the merits of the matter.

6.

The writ petition is disposed of, with the above directions. No costs.