AI Structured Summary
Not yet generated for this judgment
Judgment
5 paragraphs · 99 words
1.
The learned Judge is right. Inder Pershad Singh v. Campbell 7 C.P 474 : 8 G.L.E. 501 and Goculdas Madhavji v. Narsu Yenkuji 13 B.P 630
show that where a sub-lease is entered into in the belief that the original contract will be subsisting during the period during which the sub-contract
is to be worked, the cancellation of the contract terminates the sub-contract as well: we think that proposition is unobjectionable. The plaintiff has
recovered on the principle of quantum meruil for what he has done. The suit was rightly dismissed.
2.
The appeal is dismissed with costs.