Supreme CourtFull Bench(1997) 04 SC CK 0177

T.N. Godavarman Thirumulkpad vs Union of India (UOI) and Others A. Rangarajan and Others Vs Union of India (UOI) and Others

Supreme Court Of India · Decided on 22 April 1997 · Citation: (1997) 11 SCC 114 : (1998) SCC(L&S) 94

HON’BLE JUDGES
J. S. Verma, C.J · Sujata V. Manohar, J · B. N. Kirpal, J
CASE NUMBER
Writ Petition (C) No. 202 Of 1995 With I.As Nos. 1, 5, 5-A, 15, 16, 19-23, 25-27, 29, 33-36, 52, 54-75, 77-89, 91-95, 100, 104-110, 112-118, 120-122 And 124-178 Of 1997 With Contempt Petition No. 539 Of 1996 In W.Ps (C) No. 171 Of 1996 With No. 897 Of 199

CourtKutchehry membership

More clarity. Every judgment.

Download court copies, explore connected cases and make more of every research session.

Loading membership options…

Ask AI about this case

AI Structured Summary

Not yet generated for this judgment

Judgment

5 paragraphs · 394 words
1.

In respect of most of the States, if not all, it is not clear from their affidavits as to what is the exact programme of that State in respect of the subject-matter of these writ petitions and the extent to which steps have already been taken to do the needful. In order to deal with the several IAs which have been filed seeking interim directions/modification of the interim directions already made it is necessary to have a comprehensive statement of all the States about the past activity and their future programme to tackle the problem and prevent degradation and degeneration of the forests. After hearing the learned Attorney General, the amicus curiae and the learned counsel for the several States, it does appear that more time is needed by the States to file a Comprehensive Statement as above and the matters can be heard only thereafter. The learned Attorney General submits that the central Government is also involved in performance of the necessary exercise including the study required for the formulation/revision of the National Forest Policy and that this exercise will take some more time to complete. We are also informed by the learned amicus curiae that the report of the Rajeshwar Committee is likely to be submitted by the end of this month. The common request of all the learned counsel including the learned Attorney General is that the hearing of these matters be deferred for the time being to enable completion of the exercise by all the authorities concerned so that the court is required to hear and decide only those aspects of these matters which remain after the exercise has been completed by all the authorities/Governments. They also submitted that hearing for the purpose of some interim directions alone may be required but that too may be done early next month.

2.

All the States are required to file the Comprehensive Statement as above on or before 3/5/1997.

3.

In order to save time, Shri Rajeshwar is requested to hand over his Report to the learned amicus curiae Shri Harish N. Salve who would then furnish copies of the same to the learned Attorney General and counsel for the States concerned.

4.

Research Foundation for Science Technology and Ecology and Bombay Environmental Action Group are permitted to file their affidavits through the amicus curiae. court Masters

5.

List on 6/5/1997.