High CourtsSingle Bench(2019) 06 KL CK 0019

T.M.Sreelakshmi vs Mahatma Gandhi University

High Court Of Kerala · Decided on 7 June 2019

HON’BLE JUDGES
P.V.Asha, J
CASE NUMBER
Writ Petition (Civil) No. 15433 Of 2019

CourtKutchehry membership

More clarity. Every judgment.

Download court copies, explore connected cases and make more of every research session.

Loading membership options…

Ask AI about this case

AI Structured Summary

Not yet generated for this judgment

Judgment

15 paragraphs · 323 words
1.

Petitioner is a Graduate in Economics with 70% physical disability. Initially, when the results were published, it was shown that she had failed in the

examination. In those circumstances, the petitioner submits that though she could not register her application because the mark list to the effect that

she passed the examination was not available. It is sated that the last date for submission of application online for admission to Post Graduate Degree

course under the 3rd respondent was on 25.05.2019. Petitioner got her marks corrected and a consolidated marks from grade card was issued by the

University only on 27.05.2019. Even before that the petitioner had filed a writ petition before this Court in W.P.(C).No.13869 of 2019 for a direction to

the 3rd respondent to accept her application and process the same for admission to M.A. (Economics) without insisting marks. Pending that writ

petition, petitioner got the grade card on 27.05.2019.

2.

Learned Government Pleader on instructions submits that one seat for physical handicapped candidate is available under the 3rd respondent for

admission to M.A. (Economics). It is also pointed out that there is no other applicant under that category. It is also pointed out that in the absence of

an applicant under physically handicapped category, the said seat is to be reverted to general category.

However, since the seat is not already reverted and the petitioner is a physical handicapped candidate with 70% disability who got her marks and

grade card subsequent to the last date of application, there shall be a direction to the 3rd respondent to accept her application and to consider the same

for admission in accordance with her eligibility against the unfilled seat reserved for physically handicapped. It is made clear that admission shall not

be denied for want of application before the last date. This shall be done within a period of one week from the date of receipt of a copy of the

judgment.