High CourtsDivision Bench(2007) 02 KL CK 0044

T.J. Abraham, Aleyamma Abraham and Manoj Abraham vs Aleyamma Joy

High Court Of Kerala · Decided on 23 February 2007

HON’BLE JUDGES
V. Bhaskaran Nambiar, J · K.K. Narendran, J
RESULT
Dismissed
CASE NUMBER
CRP No''s. 264 and 265 of 2006

CourtKutchehry membership

More clarity. Every judgment.

Download court copies, explore connected cases and make more of every research session.

Loading membership options…

Ask AI about this case

AI Structured Summary

Not yet generated for this judgment

Judgment

3 paragraphs · 201 words
1.

We have heard the counsel for the petitioners and the counsel for the respondent. We are happy that the dispute in the above revision petitions have been amicably settled after discussions at the adalath. The settlement is as follows:

The respondent claims that she has 57.50 cents extent of land in Survey No. 229/1 in Thiruvalla village in Thiruvalla Taluk. She is prepared to allow on the northern side of this property a pathway measuring 2 = feet wide running east to west. This should satisfy the petitioners for their right of way to their property on the western side.

2.

Both the parties either independently or jointly can file an application before the Taluk Surveyor, Thiruvalla village in Thiruvalla Taluk for identification and measurement of the property of Smt. Aleyamma Joy. If it is found that the extent of property is less than 57.50 cents, even then, the respondent agrees that she will allow the pathway on the northern side of her property. On the other hand, it is found that if the extent of property exceeds 57.50 cents, half of the excess extent will form part of her property and the remaining half will belong to the petitioners.