High CourtsDivision Bench(1926) 07 MAD CK 0001

(Tiruvallur Vangipuram) Krishnamacharulu vs Chitlur Venkata Subbiah

Madras High Court · Decided on 26 July 1926 · Citation: AIR 1926 Mad 1059 : 97 Ind. Cas. 795 : (1926) 24 LW 448

HON’BLE JUDGES
Jackson, J

CourtKutchehry membership

More clarity. Every judgment.

Download court copies, explore connected cases and make more of every research session.

Loading membership options…

Ask AI about this case

AI Structured Summary

Not yet generated for this judgment

Judgment

13 paragraphs · 233 words

Jackson, J.—petitioner seeks to revise the order of the District Munsif of Nandalur on I.A. No. 490 of 1924 extending by six months the

period allowed in the decree in O.S. No. 250 of 1922 of the Court for obtaining a succession certificate. The decree runs:

Time for succession certificate two months. The suit shall stand dismissed in default.

2.

The counter-petitioner accordingly applied for the certificate, and finding that two months would be an insufficient period moved before its

expiry for an extension.

3.

It cannot be said that an extension was not warranted in these circumstances, and the only question is whether the District Munsif acted with

jurisdiction in granting such an extension under Sections 148 and 151, CPC on the assumption that the decree was a preliminary decree. It must be

held that the decree was final, and neither Section 148 nor Section 151 authorizes a Court to meddle with its final decrees. Probably the Munsif

would have been better advised to act under Order 47, Rule 1.

4.

The circumstances that two months happened to be an inadequate period was a sufficient reason for applying that that period should be

reviewed. But considering that substantial justice has been done the fact that the District Munsif misapprehended the appropriate rule does not

necessitate the exercise of this Court''s revisional power.

5.

The petition is dismissed. There will be no costs.