High CourtsSingle Bench(2023) 03 MAD CK 0015

Thirumurugan vs State

Madras High Court · Decided on 2 March 2023

HON’BLE JUDGES
T.V.Thamilselvi, J
CASE NUMBER
Criminal Original Petition No.4947 Of 2023

CourtKutchehry membership

More clarity. Every judgment.

Download court copies, explore connected cases and make more of every research session.

Loading membership options…

Ask AI about this case

AI Structured Summary

Not yet generated for this judgment

Judgment

13 paragraphs · 554 words

T.V.Thamilselvi, J

1.

The petitioner, who was arrested and remanded to judicial custody on 11.02.2023 for the alleged offence under Sections 4(1-A), 4(1)(a) of Tamil Nadu Prohibition Act in Crime No.12 of 2023 on the file of the respondent police, seeks bail.

2.

The case of prosecution is that on 11.02.2023 on a secret information, while the respondent police made a search in Nedumaoor Village and on search, they found that the petitioner was found to be in possession of 15 litres of arrack, which was kept in a plastic cover illegally without any valid license and the same was seized by them. Hence, the complaint was registered against the petitioner.

3.

The learned counsel appearing for petitioner submitted that he is no way connected with the offence and he has not committed any of offence as alleged by the respondent police. He would also submit that he has been falsely implicated in this case and he will abide by any condition that may be imposed by this court. He would also submit that the petitioner has been suffering incarceration for more than 18 days from 11.02.2023. Hence, he prayed to grant bail to the petitioner.

4.

The learned Government Advocate (Crl. Side) appearing for respondent would submit that 3 previous cases similar in nature pending against the petitioner and he is the sole accused. He would also submit that if he is released on bail, he would hamper the investigation and tamper the witnesses and the investigation is almost completed. However, he would vehemently opposed to grant bail to the petitioner.

5.

Considering the facts and circumstances and also the fact that the investigation is almost completed, and considering the period of incarceration undergone by the petitioner, this Court is inclined to grant bail to the petitioner with certain conditions.

6.

Accordingly, the petitioner is directed to deposit a sum of Rs.10,000/- (Rupees ten thousand only) as non-refundable deposit to the credit of Madras High Court Advocate Clerks Welfare Association, Chennai. A/c No. 484077244, Bank : Indian Bank, Branch : High Court, IFSC Code : IDIB000M157 and on such deposit, the petitioner is ordered to be released on bail on executing separate bonds for a sum of Rs.10,000/- (Rupees Ten Thousand only) with two sureties, for a like sum to the satisfaction of the learned Judicial Magistrate, Sankarapuram, and on further conditions that::

(a) the sureties shall affix their photographs and left thumb impression in the surety bond and the Magistrate may obtain a copy of their Aadhar card or Bank pass Book to ensure their identity;

(b) the petitioner shall report before the respondent police daily at 10.30 a.m. for the period of eight weeks.

(c) the petitioner shall not tamper with evidence or witness either during investigation or trial;

(d) the petitioner shall not abscond either during investigation or trial;

(e) on breach of any of the aforesaid conditions, the learned Magistrate/ Trial Court is entitled to take appropriate action against the petitioner in accordance with law as if the conditions have been imposed and the petitioner released on bail by the learned Magistrate/Trial Court himself as laid down by the Hon'ble Supreme Court in P.K.Shaji Vs. State of Kerala [(2005) AIR SCW 5560]; and;

(f) if the accused thereafter absconds, a fresh FIR can be registered under Section 229-A IPC.