High CourtsSingle Bench(2011) 03 MAD CK 0114

Thirumali vs The Revenue Divisional Officer, The Tahsildar and Inspector of Police

Madras High Court · Decided on 2 March 2011

HON’BLE JUDGES
M. Jaichandren, J
CASE NUMBER
Writ Petition No. 4342 of 2011

CourtKutchehry membership

More clarity. Every judgment.

Download court copies, explore connected cases and make more of every research session.

Loading membership options…

Ask AI about this case

AI Structured Summary

Not yet generated for this judgment

Judgment

20 paragraphs · 350 words

M. Jaichandren, J.—Heard the learned Counsel appearing on behalf of the Petitioner and Mr. R. Thirugnanam, the learned Special

Government Pleader appearing on behalf of the Respondents.

2.

This Writ Petition has been filed for the issuance of a Writ of Mandamus, to direct the second Respondent to release the Tractor and Trailor

bearing Registration No. TN 32 T 9966, seized by the first Respondent, on 08.02.2011.

3.

In view of the averments made by the Petitioner and taking into consideration the relief prayed for by the Petitioner and since, similar orders

have been passed by this Court, the second Respondent is directed to release the vehicle, bearing Registration No. TN 32 T 9966 , to the

Petitioner, forthwith, on his fulfilling the following conditions:

(i) The Petitioner shall establish the ownership of the vehicle, by producing the necessary documents and the certificates, before the second

Respondent, including the R.C. Book.

(ii) The Petitioner shall not alienate the vehicle, in any manner, till the adjudication proceedings are completed.

(iii) The Petitioner shall deposit a sum of Rs. 30,000/-(Rupees Thirty thousand only), in cash, with the second Respondent, which will be subject to

the final orders to be passed in the adjudication proceedings.

(iv) The Petitioner shall give an undertaking before the second Respondent that he shall not use the vehicle, for any illegal purpose, in future and

that he shall also produce the vehicle, as and when it is required by the second Respondent.

(v) This order for the release of the vehicle can be availed of by the Petitioner, if the vehicle is not in the custody of the criminal Court. If the vehicle

is in the custody of a criminal Court, it would be open to the Petitioner to approach the Magistrate concerned to get the vehicle released by filing

an appropriate application, in accordance with law.

(vi) The adjudication proceedings shall be completed by the concerned authority, within a period of two months from the date of receipt of a copy

of this order.

4.

With the above directions, the Writ Petition is disposed of. No costs.