Tribunals and CommissionsDivision Bench(2023) 10 NCLAT CK 3381

The Regional Provident Fund Commissioner vs K.P. Dileep, RP & Anr.

National Company Law Appellate Tribunal, CHENNAI Bench · Decided on 31 October 2023

HON’BLE JUDGES
Rakesh Kumar Jain, Member (Judicial) · Shreesha Merla, Member (Technical)
CASE NUMBER
Company Appeal (AT) (CH) (Ins) No. 374 of 2023 (IA Nos. 1141, 1142, 1143 & 1144/2023)

CourtKutchehry membership

More clarity. Every judgment.

Download court copies, explore connected cases and make more of every research session.

Loading membership options…

CourtKutchehry membership

More clarity. Every judgment.

Download court copies, explore connected cases and make more of every research session.

Loading membership options…

Ask AI about this case

AI Structured Summary

Not yet generated for this judgment

Judgment

8 paragraphs · 306 words

O R D E R

I.A. No. 1144 of 2023

This appeal is filed along with an application beairng I.A. No. 1144 of 2023 for seeking condonation of delay of 526 days in filing of the appeal.

The impugned order was passed on 04.04.2022. Appeal has been filed through e-filing on 14.09.2023.

Section 61 of the Insolvency and Bankruptcy Code, 2016 (Code) provides a right to file appeal to an aggrieved person against the order of the Adjudicating Authority. Section 61 (2) prescribes the period of 30 days to file the appeal. However, proviso to Section 61 (2) further extends a period of 15 days for filing the appeal in case a sufficient cause is shown to the satisfaction of the Appellate Authority for condonation of delay. Thus, the total period of limitation prescribed both under Section 61 (2) and proviso to it is 30+15 i.e. 45 days. Hon’ble Supreme Court in the case of ‘National Spot Exchange vs. Mr. Anil Kohli RP for Dunar Foods Limited’ in SCC Online SC 716, 2021 in CIVIL APPEAL NO. 6187 OF 2019 has held that the period beyond 15 days cannot be condoned even under Article 142 of the Constitution of India. Therefore, this court does not have the jurisdiction to entertain an application for condonation of delay beyond the period of 15 days whereas in the present case there is a huge delay of 526 days in filing of the appeal.

In view of the aforesaid facts and circumstances, the application for condonation of delay is hereby dismissed being not maintainable.

CA (AT) (Ins) No. 374 of 2023

Since we have dismissed the application for condonation of delay i.e. I.A. No. 1144 of 2023 by a separate order of today, therefore, the present appeal is not duly constituted and the same is also hereby dismissed. No costs.