High CourtsDivision Bench(2023) 10 DEL CK 3643

The Pr. Commissioner Of Income Tax -4 vs GE India Business Services Pvt. Ltd.

Delhi High Court · Decided on 10 October 2023

HON’BLE JUDGES
Rajiv Shakdher, J · Girish Kathpalia, J
RESULT
Disposed Of
CASE NUMBER
ITA 1215/2018

CourtKutchehry membership

More clarity. Every judgment.

Download court copies, explore connected cases and make more of every research session.

Loading membership options…

CourtKutchehry membership

More clarity. Every judgment.

Download court copies, explore connected cases and make more of every research session.

Loading membership options…

Ask AI about this case

AI Structured Summary

Not yet generated for this judgment

Judgment

8 paragraphs · 196 words

RAJIV SHAKDHER, J. (ORAL):-

1.

This appeal concerns Assessment Year (AY) 2009-10.

2.

Via, the instant appeal, the appellant/revenue seeks to assail the order dated 21.02.2018 passed by the Income Tax Appellate Tribunal [in short “Tribunal”].

3.

On the previous date, we had noted the stand taken by Mr Prashant Meharchandani, learned senior standing counsel, who appears on behalf of appellant/revenue.

4.

Mr Meharchandani in no uncertain terms had indicated to the court that the issues raised in the instant appeal are covered against the appellant/revenue, by virtue of the judgment rendered by the coordinate bench of this court in Rampgreen Solutions (P.) Ltd. vs. Commissioner of Income-tax, [2015] 60 taxmann.com 355 (Delhi).

5.

Although Mr Sachit Jolly, learned counsel, who appears on behalf of respondent/assessee, had sought to demonstrate that the issue raised in this appeal did not call for interference by the court de hors the judgment rendered in Rampgreen Solution, he says that the appeal can be disposed of on the basis of statement made by Mr Meharchandani.

6.

In that view of the matter, the above-captioned appeal is closed.

7.

Parties will act based on the digitally signed copy of the order.