High CourtsSINGLE BENCH(2017) 10 MAD CK 0001

The Oriental Insurance Company Limited, Rep.by its Branch Manager vs Muthumanickam, & Ors.

Madras High Court · Decided on 20 October 2017

HON’BLE JUDGES
G.R.Swaminathan
RESULT
Dismissed
CASE NUMBER
573 of 2015 and M P((MD)No 1 of 2015

CourtKutchehry membership

More clarity. Every judgment.

Download court copies, explore connected cases and make more of every research session.

Loading membership options…

Ask AI about this case

AI Structured Summary

Not yet generated for this judgment

Judgment

14 paragraphs · 260 words
1.

The Oriental Insruance Company has filed this Civil Miscellaneous Appeal questioning the award dated 14.11.2014, made in MCOP.No.845

of 2012 on the file of the Motor Accident Claims Tribunal cum Additional District & Sessions Judge, Dindigul.

2.

The claimants are respondents 1 and 2 herein. The deceased Ramalingam was the son of the claimants. He was working as a driver. When he

was driving a Omni van, the bus belonging to the third respondent herein was coming from the opposite direction and dashed against him causing

his death. A few others also died in the accident. Crime No.68/2012 was registered on the file of Thirunagar police station against the driver

employed by the third respondent herein.

3.

The Tribunal rightly fixed the negligence on the driver of the third respondent. Since the said bus was insured with the appellant herein, the

appellant was liable to pay the compensation. The income of the deceased was fixed at Rs.6,000/-. The annual income given to the claimants was

fixed at Rs.48,000/-.

4.

Adopting the multiplier 14, a sum of Rs.6,72,000/- was determined as a pecuniary loss. A sum of Rs.10,000/- was awarded towards loss of

love and affection. A sum of Rs.5,000/- was awarded towards funeral expenses. In all, a sum of Rs.6,87,000/- was given with interest at the rate

of 7.5 per annum. This cannot be said to be excessive. Only on the ground of quantum, this appeal has been filed.

5.

I see no merit in this appeal. It stands dismissed. No costs.

Consequently, connected miscellaneous petition is also dismissed.