High CourtsFull Bench(1910) 03 MAD CK 0037

The Official Assignee of Madras vs The Society for the Propogation of The Gospel

Madras High Court · Decided on 16 March 1910 · Citation: 6 Ind. Cas. 212

HON’BLE JUDGES
Munro, J · Miller, J · Abdur Rahim, J

CourtKutchehry membership

More clarity. Every judgment.

Download court copies, explore connected cases and make more of every research session.

Loading membership options…

Ask AI about this case

AI Structured Summary

Not yet generated for this judgment

Judgment

10 paragraphs · 137 words

Miller, J.—This ease is on all fours with Lupprian''s case Letters Patent Appeal No. 138 of 1909. The money was not paid in by the society

for any special purpose. Messrs. Arbuth not and Company owed the society Rs. 5,009 and promised to buy for them Government promissory-

notes but before they did so, they suspended payment.

2.

Here as in Luppriari''s case Letters Patent Appeal No. 138 of 1909, I find nothing more than a promise to buy out of the funds of the Bank the

securities which the society desired to purchase.

3.

I think the appeal must be allowed with :costs throughout.

Munro, J.

4.

For the reasons given in my judgment in Lupprian''s Case Letters Patent Appeal No. 138 of 1909, I agree to the proposed order.

Abdur Rahim, J.

5.

I agree.