High CourtsSingle Bench(2012) 09 DEL CK 0029

The New India Assurance Co. Ltd. vs Sh. Vinod Dass and Others

Delhi High Court · Decided on 4 September 2012

HON’BLE JUDGES
G.P. Mittal, J
CASE NUMBER
MAC App. 540 of 2004

CourtKutchehry membership

More clarity. Every judgment.

Download court copies, explore connected cases and make more of every research session.

Loading membership options…

Ask AI about this case

AI Structured Summary

Not yet generated for this judgment

Judgment

7 paragraphs · 300 words

G.P. Mittal, J.—The Appellant New India Assurance Company Limited impugns a judgment dated 15.07.2004 passed by the Motor Accident Claims Tribunal (the Claims Tribunal) whereby while awarding a compensation of Rs. 2,23,575/- in favour of the First Respondent, the Appellant was granted recovery rights on the ground that the insured committed breach of the terms of policy. The Appellant Insurance Company did not take steps for service of Respondent No. 1 in spite of the fact that he (Respondent No. 1/the Claimant) was ordered to be served by publication in ''Amar Ujala.''

2.

By order dated 15.07.2009 the Appellant was burdened with costs of Rs. 2,000/- and he was again directed to take steps for issuance of citation in terms of order dated 19.03.2008. Neither the steps were taken nor the costs was paid. The costs imposed on the Appellant was waived by order dated 03.02.2010.

3.

The Appellant was again directed to take steps for service of the First Respondent. Again, the steps have not been taken.

4.

This Appeal was instituted in the year 2004. The Appeal as against the first Respondent is dismissed.

5.

For the reasons as stated in connected Appeals being MAC APP. 516/2004, 517/2004 and 519/2004 decided by a separate order today, the Appellant Insurance Company was not liable to pay the compensation at all, as the first Respondent was travelling as a gratuitous passenger. Since the Appeal against the first Respondent has been dismissed, he shall be entitled to withdraw the compensation deposited with the Claims Tribunal.

6.

As the Appellant had no liability to pay the compensation at all, it would be entitled to recover it from the owner and driver of the offending vehicle No. HR-38B-2523.

7.

The Appeal is disposed of in above terms. Pending Applications also stand disposed of.