High CourtsSINGLE BENCH(2017) 02 DEL CK 0231

THE NEW INDIA ASSURANCE CO. LTD. vs BABU LAL & ORS.

Delhi High Court · Decided on 3 February 2017

HON’BLE JUDGES
Sunil Gaur
CASE NUMBER
251 of 2008

CourtKutchehry membership

More clarity. Every judgment.

Download court copies, explore connected cases and make more of every research session.

Loading membership options…

Ask AI about this case

AI Structured Summary

Not yet generated for this judgment

Judgment

6 paragraphs · 373 words
1.

Impugned Award grants compensation of Rs.19,800/- with interest @ 9% p.a. to respondent-claimant, who was injured in a road accident on 22nd April, 1998. The factual matrix of this case already stands noted in the impugned Award and needs no reproduction. Suffice to note that factum of accident has not been disputed before the learned Motor Accident Claims Tribunal and driver/owner of vehicle in question have not led any evidence before the learned Tribunal. On the basis of evidence led, impugned Award has been rendered.

2.

The challenge to the impugned Award by learned counsel for appellant is on the ground that driver of the vehicle in question was holding license for light motor vehicle whereas he was driving the heavy transport vehicle i.e. a truck and so, there is breach of insurance policy condition, which absolve the appellant-insurer from the liability to pay the compensation awarded.

3.

As per order of 5th April, 2011, service is complete.

4.

Upon hearing and on perusal of evidence on record and the impugned Award, I find that quantum of compensation awarded is adequate and in view of owner and driver of vehicle in question not stepping into the witness box, the liability to pay compensation is of respondent No.2- owner of truck in question.

5.

However, in the first instance, Insurer ought to pay awarded compensation with right to recover it from the owner of vehicle in question as it is evident from the order of 28th January, 2010 that appellant has deposited the awarded amount with interest with the learned Motor Accident Claims Tribunal and in the said order, it was noted that the claim in this appeal relates to recovery rights and there is no order to stay operation of impugned Award. In such a situation, appellant is granted recovery rights qua respondent No.2 in view of Supreme Court''s decision in National Insurance Co. Ltd. v. Laxmi Narai Dhut, (2007) 3 SCC 700 wherein it has been reiterated that in a case of third party risks, the Insurer has to indemnify the amount, and if so, advised, to recover the same from the insured.

6.

Consequentially, the impugned Award stands modified to the aforesaid extent and the appeal is accordingly disposed of.