High CourtsSINGLE BENCH(2017) 11 MAD CK 0057

The Managing Director, Tamil Nadu State Express Transport Corporation, Puducherry vs Sumathy, & Ors.

Madras High Court · Decided on 10 November 2017

HON’BLE JUDGES
G.R.Swaminathan
CASE NUMBER
439 of 2015 and MP(MD)No 1 of 2015

CourtKutchehry membership

More clarity. Every judgment.

Download court copies, explore connected cases and make more of every research session.

Loading membership options…

Ask AI about this case

AI Structured Summary

Not yet generated for this judgment

Judgment

7 paragraphs · 294 words
1.

Heard the learned counsel for the parties.

2.

The Transport Corporation has filed this appeal on the ground of quantum.

3.

The deceased was a bachelor. The accident took place on 03.10.2010. The monthly income of the deceased was taken as Rs. 10,500/-. He was a prepaid airport taxi driver. He was aged about 24 years. He was a bachelor. The Tribunal therefore ought to have effected 50% deduction. Instead only one third deduction was made. The impugned award is liable to be modified only on this ground. In all other respects, the award is confirmed.

4.

The Tribunal fastened the 50% liability on the appellant corporation and another 50% liability on the eight respondent. The eight respondent herein was shown as fourth respondent before the Tribunal and they remained exparte before the Tribunal also. If only 50% deduction is made, the monthly income available for the family is Rs.5250/-. Applying the multiplier 18, the pecuniary loss would come to Rs.11,34,000/-. Adding damages under other conventional heads, the total would come to Rs. 11,99,000/-.

5.

The award dated 29.07.2013 made in MCOP.No.368 of 2011 on the file of the Motor Accident Claims Tribunal / Principal Sub Court, Tenkasi is modified.

6.

The appellant insurance company is fastened with the liability to pay a sum of Rs.5,99,500/- and the eight respondent herein has to pay the balance amount with interest at the rate of

7.

5% per annum and costs, within a period of eight weeks from the date of receipt of a copy of this order, less the amount already deposited if any. On such deposit, the claimants are entitled to withdraw the said amount, as apportioned by the Tribunal, less the amount already withdrawn by them, if any, by filing proper application.