High CourtsSINGLE BENCH(2017) 10 MAD CK 0078

The Managing Director, State Express Corporation vs R.Arokiasamy

Madras High Court · Decided on 6 October 2017

HON’BLE JUDGES
G.R.Swaminathan
RESULT
Dismissed
CASE NUMBER
377 of 2015 and M P(MD) No 1 of 2015

CourtKutchehry membership

More clarity. Every judgment.

Download court copies, explore connected cases and make more of every research session.

Loading membership options…

Ask AI about this case

AI Structured Summary

Not yet generated for this judgment

Judgment

5 paragraphs · 291 words
1.

This Civil Miscellaneous Appeal has been filed by the Managing Director, State Express Transport Corporation, challenging the award dated 26.08.2014 made in M.C.O.P.No.1252 of 2009 on the file of the of the Motor Accidents Claims Tribunal- III Additional Sub-Court, Thiruchirappalli.

2.

The respondent herein filed the said claim petition seeking the payment of a sum of Rs.2,00,000/- (Rupees Two Lakhs only) as compensation for the injuries suffered by him on 12.02.2009. It is the case of the respondent herein that when he was riding his bicycle, the bus belonging to the appellant Corporation dashed against him, since it was driven in a rash and negligent manner.

3.

The Tribunal gave a finding that the accident took place on account of rash and negligent driving of the driver employed with the appellant Corporation. Therefore, applying the principle of vicarious liability, the appellant is held liable to pay the compensation. There is no reason to interfere with the said finding.

4.

As regards the quantum of compensation payable to the respondent, the Court below noted that the disability suffered by the respondent herein was 42%. Considering the age of the respondent, a sum of Rs.84,000/- (Rupees Eighty Four Thousand only) was quantified under the said head. After quantifying the other heads of damages payable to the claimants, a sum of Rs.1, 57,648/- (Rupees One Lakh Fifty Seven Thousand Six Hundred and Fourty Eight only) was directed to be paid as compensation. The award amount cannot be said to be excessive. The said amount is clearly justifiable.

5.

I find no reason to interfere with the award passed by the Tribunal. I find no merits in this appeal. The Civil Miscellaneous Appeal stands dismissed. Consequently, M.P.(MD)No.1 of 2015 is also closed. No costs.