High CourtsSingle Bench(1915) 03 MAD CK 0088

The Maharaja of Venkatagiri vs Ambarkana Srinivasa Row

Madras High Court · Decided on 15 March 1915 · Citation: AIR 1916 Mad 507(1) : 29 Ind. Cas. 321

HON’BLE JUDGES
Ayling, J

CourtKutchehry membership

More clarity. Every judgment.

Download court copies, explore connected cases and make more of every research session.

Loading membership options…

Ask AI about this case

AI Structured Summary

Not yet generated for this judgment

Judgment

2 paragraphs · 151 words
1.

An order of attachment of property u/s 146 of the Criminal Procedure Code remains in force until withdrawn, but it is the duty of the Magistrate to withdraw it and release the attachment, as soon as it is brought to his notice that a competent Court has determined the rights of the parties thereto, or the person entitled to possession The only question is whether that has been done in the present case. The finding of the District Judge on the first issue in Original Suit No. 3 of 1902 concludes the question of title between the parties to that suit. The fact that he was unable to determine the question of possession and that this Court remarked in its appeal judgment that defendant''s (the present petitioner''s) evidence of enjoyment was equally weak, is immaterial.

2.

The continuance of the attachment is illegal and it should be released at once.