High CourtsDivision Bench(2007) 08 MAD CK 0146

The Karur Vysya Bank Employees Union vs The Securities and Exchange Board of India, The Reserve Bank of India, The Karur Vysya Bank Limited and Union of India (UOI)

Madras High Court · Decided on 29 August 2007

HON’BLE JUDGES
S.J. Mukhopadhaya, J · K. Suguna, J
RESULT
Allowed
CASE NUMBER
W.A. No. 2121 of 2004

CourtKutchehry membership

More clarity. Every judgment.

Download court copies, explore connected cases and make more of every research session.

Loading membership options…

Ask AI about this case

AI Structured Summary

Not yet generated for this judgment

Judgment

232 paragraphs · 4,446 words

S.J. Mukhopadhaya, J.—The Karur Vysya Bank Employees Union (hereinafter referred to as the ''Union'') has preferred this appeal against

the order dated 20th Sept., 2002, in W.P. No. 11544/95 whereby and whereunder learned single Judge dismissed the writ petition on the ground

that the said writ petition has become infructuous.

2.

The matter relates to issuance of shares of banks to their employees/workers. On 16th March, 1985, while introducing the Finance Bill in the

Parliament, the Finance Minister also introduced a scheme called ''The Employees Stock Option Scheme''. The scheme was voluntary in nature on

the part of the employer company as well as on the part of the employees irrespective of their nature of appointment. According to the petitioner,

as per the Bill aforesaid, the employees were to be given free option of savings under the scheme and the saving was for a period of five years

since joining of employee under the scheme. On completion of the fifth year, the amount would compulsorily get converted into equity shares and

conversion will take place at a price determined in the year in which the scheme was introduced by the company. This would however be

permissible only at 80% of the average market price of the company''s equity shares or the fair value of the shares as determined by the Controller

of Capital Issues, whichever is less, but not less than the fair value of the shares. The equity shares issued against the debentures would also have a

lock-in period of three years from the date of issue.

3.

The guideline was issued by the Government of India on 1st Aug., 1985, circulating the ''Employees Stock Option Scheme'' (ESOS). In regard

to Issue of Capital reservation for employees, following guideline was issued on 1st Aug., 1985, from the Ministry of Finance, Department of

Economic Affairs, as quoted hereunder:

Issue of Capital - Reservation for Employees -

Guidelines dated 1.8.1995

The Finance Minister, while making his Budget Speech on 16th march, 1985, announced the introduction of Stock Option Scheme for employees

as follows:

The Government is also considering the introduction of a scheme of stock option to the employees and workers of companies to encourage their

participation in management"".

1.

Keeping in view the above announcement, companies are advised that while proposing a further issue of capital to the Controller of Capital

Issues, they should make a reservation of 5 per cent of the further issue to their employees/workers on an equitable basis. In the case of public

issues, the shares not taken up by employees/workers, would be added to the public issue. In the case of rights issue an additional offer to the

employees should be made simultaneously with the offer to the existing shareholders at a price to be fixed by the Controller of Capital Issues. Right

of renunciation need not be given to the employees and the unsubscribed portion would lapse if not taken up by the employees. Necessary

resolutions under the provisions of Section 81 of the Companies Act, 1956 should be produced for reservation to employees while submitting the

proposal to the Controller of Capital Issues.

According to the petitioner, as far as banking companies are concerned, no bank had been permitted to issue debentures for raising further capital

and the issue of further capital is only done through issue of equity shares. Hence, insofar as banking companies are concerned, the question of

issue of convertible debentures would not arise, but 5% of the further capital to be released in the form of equity shares would be reserved for its

employees. On 1st Dec., 1990, the erstwhile Controller of Capital Issues issued guideline on per cent of shares. It followed by a detailed guideline

issued by Reserve Bank of India (hereinafter referred to as ''RBI''), Department of Banking Operations and Development on 17th June, 1994 vide

DBOD No. BC 76/16.13.100/94. All Indian commercial banks in private sectors, including Karur Vysya Bank (hereinafter referred to as the

''Bank'') were directed to follow such guideline in exercise of power conferred by Section 35 of the Banking Regulation Act, 1949. The following

directions were issued:

3.

In view of the above mentioned factors and in exercise of the powers conferred u/s 35A of the Banking Regulation Act, 1949, the RBI having

considered it necessary in public interest and in the interest of banking policy, issues the following directions:

i) Public Issues

The pricing of shares to be issued by banks should not be less than that based on the net asset value according to the guidelines of erstwhile

Controller of Capital Issues (CCI) in December, 1990. For the purpose of determining the profit earning capacity value, the capitalisation factor

shall be taken as 10 per cent.

ii) Preferential issue of shares

While the preferential allotment of shares at preferential prices would generally be discouraged, the RBI may permit banks to make such allotment

selectively to prevent the destabilisation of the existing well performing managements, subject to the following conditions:

a) The preferential allotment should be backed by the resolutions of the Board of Directors and the General Body.

b) While approving the preferential allotment, the majority of the shareholders, excluding the beneficiaries, should support the preferential allotment

at the preferential price. c) Every preferential allotment of shares by banks shall be at not less than the market value of the shares to be determined

on the basis of their average price during the immediate preceding six months at the main listing centre calculated on the monthly average of high

and low rates quoted for the shares at such centres. However, in the absence of a market price (as in the case of unlisted companies or where

shares are not regularly traded) the value of shares should be not less than the value on the basis of the net asset value and earnings per share

according to the guidelines of the erstwhile CCI in December, 1990, as explained at (i) above.

iii) Rights issue and special allotment to employees

In order to ensure that adequate reserves are built up, in the case of rights issue to all such shareholders or special allotment to employees, the

price should not be less than half of the price fixed for the public issue determined according to the CCI formula of December, 1990.

iv) Bonus issues

The bank managements are free to take decisions on bonus issues provided such issues are made simultaneously with rights/public issues made

under these directions and subject to banks following SEBI guidelines, as applicable.

4.

In the present case, we are concerned with the rights issue and special allotment to the employees as shown in the guideline dated 17th June,

1994 at Clause (3) and quoted above.

The bank in question, vide letter No. CS/FIM/382/94-95 dated 20th June, 1994, sought permission from RBI for issue of rights/bonus equity

shares to its employees. The RBI, vide their letter DBOD No. 16.01.065/94 dated 8th July, 1995, agreed and granted such permission subject to

approval of Securities Exchange Board of India (hereinafter referred to as ''SEBI''), relevant portion of which is quoted hereunder:

Dear Sir

Issue of Rights/Bonus Equity Shares

Please refer to your letter No. CS/FIM/382/94-95 dated 20th June, 1994, on the above subject. We are agreeable to your bank''s capital issues

as under, subject to approval of SEBI and the bank complying with legal and other formalities in this regard.

(a) Twenty lakhs rights shares of Rs. 10/- each at a premium of Rs. 25/- per share in the ratio of 1:1.

(b) One lakh shares of Rs. 10/- each at a premium of Rs. 25/- per share to the permanent employees of the bank.

(c) Twenty lakhs bonus shares in the ratio of 1:1. This will be excluded for the rights issue being offered now by the bank.

2.

Please note that the Reserve Bank of India does not in any manner undertake any responsibility for the financial soundness or otherwise of the

issues.

Yours faithfully,

Deputy Chief Officer

5.

With regard to rights issue and special allotment to employees, the RBI, in order to ensure that adequate resources are built up, decided that in

the case of rights issue to all the share holders or special allotment to employees, the price should not be less than half of the price fixed for the

public issue determined according to formula issued by the Controller of Capital Issues in December, 1990. It was also informed that the above

requirement should be complied with and in addition to those prescribed guidelines of the SEBI insofar as the latter are not inconsistent with or

contrary to the directions of the RBI.

6.

At the 75th Annual General Meeting of the Bank on 16th Sept., 1994, a resolution was passed to raise the authorised capital of the bank from

Rs. 3 Crores to Rs. 12 Crores. A further resolution was passed in accordance with the provisions of Section 81(1)(A) and subject to the approval

of the RBI that 1,01,300 shares of Rs. 10/= each should be offered to the permanent employees at a premium of Rs. 25/= per share if they are on

the rolls of the bank as on 23rd March, 1994. Each employee was entitled to 50 shares with a lock-in period of three years from the date of

allotment. In the meantime, a special resolution at item No. 12 of the members of the Bank was passed as held in its 75th Annual General Meeting,

which is relevant, is as follows:

12.

To consider and, if thought fit, to pass the following resolution with or without modification, as a SPECIAL RESOLUTION.

Resolved that in accordance with the provisions of Section 81(A) and other applicable provisions, if any, of the Companies Act, 1956, and subject

to approval of Reserve Bank of India and such other approvals, permissions and sanctions as may be necessary and subject to such condition and

modification as may be imposed by SEBI and as may be considered necessary by the Board of Directors of the Bank or as may be prescribed in

granting such approvals, permissions and sanctions which may be agreed to by the Board of Directors of the Bank, the consent of the Bank be and

is hereby granted to the Board of Directors of the Bank to offer 1,01,300 shares of Rs. 10.00 each at a premium of Rs. 25.00 per share to the

permanent employees who were on the rolls of the Bank as on 23.03.1994 and each employee is entitled to 50 (fifty only) shares with a lock in

period of 3 years from the date of allotment.

Resolved further that for the purpose of giving effect to the above, the Board of Directors be and are hereby authorised to do all things necessary

for the purpose of issue of equity shares to the permanent employees of the Bank and to take such action or give such directions as may be

necessary or desirable and to accept any modification in the proposal and terms of issue as may be considered by the Board of Directors as may

be prescribed in granting approval to the issue which may be acceptable to the Board of Directors and to decide the basis of allotment and to

settle any question of difficulty that may arise in regard to issue and allotment of equity shares to the permanent employees of the Bank.

The RBI, by letter No. DBOD No. 367/16.01.065/94 dated 1st Sept. 1994, granted approval for issue of 1,01,300/= shares of Rs. 10/= each

for cash at premium of Rs. 25/= per share to the permanent employees of the bank as against 50 shares proposed earlier by bank subject to

approval of SEBI and bank''s compliance with the legal and other formalities. However when the matter was considered by SEBI, it, vide letter

No. IMID/RM/194/195/95 dated 11th Jan., 1995, rejected such proposal on the ground that it is not in conformity with their circular No. 7 dated

5th Aug., 1994. For proper appreciation of the case, the relevant portion of the letter dated 11th Jan., 1995, is extracted hereunder:

Our observations:

CAPITAL STRUCTURE

1) The Lead manager should ensure that the bonus shares shall be allotted, dispatched to the shareholders and listed before the opening of the

issue and the ex-bonus and ex-rights price per share should be indicated in the offer document.

2) With respect to the proposed preferential allotment to the employees of the bank the lead manager should note that such allotments are

governed by SEBI Circular No. 7 dated August 5, 1994 regarding preferential allotment to select group of persons and the present proposal is not

in conformity with the above and hence the same shall be deleted from the offer document and corresponding charges shall be effected in the

capital structure, financial projections, etc.

7.

As noticed earlier, in absence of any stay, shares having been sold, learned single Judge declared that the writ petition has become infructuous,

but the appeal has been preferred by the employees Union, as according to them the question of law as was involved in the writ petition has not

been decided, which requires determination for future allotment of shares.

8.

The only question that arises for consideration is whether the circular dated 5th Aug., 1994, issued by SEBI is applicable on private sector

Indian commercial banks for the purpose of rights issue and special allotment to its employees.

9.

For determination of such issue, apart from the guidelines issued by RBI from time to time of which reference have been given and relevant

portion quoted above, it is also necessary to notice the guideline dated 5th Aug., 1994, issued by SEBI of which reference has been given in their

impugned letter dated 11th Jan., 1995.

The aforesaid guideline dated 5th Aug., 1994, issued by SEBI relates to ''Disclosure of Investors Protection''. The need for protecting the interest

of investors were mentioned in the covering letter, as quoted hereunder:

Guidelines for Disclosure of Investor Protection

Of late, the practice of making preferential allotments of shares etc., at a price unrelated to the prevailing market price of such instruments seems to

be on the increase. Besides, companies have also been issuing warrants to select persons with a right to obtain shares in future at a price, not

bearing a fair relation to the market. The development is particularly undesirable as the allaotments are made to select persons. Therefore, there

appears to be a need for protecting the interest of the investors, who do not receive such preferential treatment by ensuring that the pricing of the

preferential allotments is market related.

SEBI has issued a press release dated August 4, 1994 giving guidelines governing the issue of shares or warrants/fully convertible

debentures/partly convertible debentures or other financial instruments made on a preferential basis. A copy of the said press release is enclosed

for your information and record.

The press release with regard to preferential issues was circulated with the said guideline dated 5th Aug., 1994, whereby following guidelines were

circulated:

Guidelines for Disclosure of Investor Protection

Of late, the practice of making preferential allotments of shares etc., at a price unrelated to the prevailing market price of such instruments seems to

be on the increase. Besides, companies have also been issuing warrants to select persons with a right to obtain shares in future at a price, not

bearing a fair relation to the market. The development is particularly undesirable as the allaotments are made to select persons. Therefore, there

appears to be a need for protecting the interest of the investors, who do not receive such preferential treatment by ensuring that the pricing of the

preferential allotments is market related.

2.

SEBI therefore issues the following guidelines governing the issue of shares or warrants/Fully convertible Debentures (FODs)/Partly Convertible

Debentures (PCDs) or other financial instruments made on a preferential basis to a select group of persons u/s 81(A) of the Companies Act, 1956.

These guidelines are being issued in terms of Section 11(1) read with Section 24 of the Securities and Exchange Board of India Act, 1992, for

orderly development of the securities market and to protect the interest of the investors at large.

3.

All issues of capital by listed companies by way of shares/FCDs/PCDs/warrants/any other financial instruments on a preferential basis to any

select group of persons, shall henceforth be subject to fulfilment of the requirements mentioned in the following paragraphs:

4.

Pricing of the Issue

The issue of shares on a preferential basis can be made at a price not less than the higher of the following:

The average of the weekly high and low of the closing prices of the related shares quoted on the stock exchange during the six months preceding

the relevant date

OR

the average of the weekly high and low of the closing prices of the related shares quoted on a stock exchange during the two weeks preceding the

relevant date.

***

12.

Preferential allotment to FIIs : Preferential allotments, if any, to be made in favour of Foreign Institutional Investors shall also be governed by

the guidelines issued by the Government of India/SEBI/Reserve Bank of India on the subject.

13.

Applicability:

These guidelines will come into force with immediate effect. Cases of preferential issues approved by the General Body of shareholders at meetings

held between 5th May, 1994 and 4th August, 1994 can be acted upon within a period of three months from the date of issue of these guidelines.

However, all cases of preferential issues approved by resolutions of the general body of shareholders held prior to 5th May, 1994 would be

governed by these guidelines, if they have not been acted upon by 4th August, 1994.

By acknowledgement card contained in letter dated 11th Jan., 1995, SEBI, while informed the bank that the vetting of document by SEBI should

not in any way be deemed or construed that the same has been cleared or approved by SEBI, under the impugned letter dated 11th Jan., 1995,

enclosed as Annexure-III to the covering letter, SEBI refused to grant approval for rights issue of two lakhs equity shares of Rs. 10/= each for

cash at premium of Rs. 25/= per share in favour of the employees of the bank.

10.

Counsel appearing on behalf of SEBI also referred to the circular No. 7 dated 5th Aug., 1994, issued by SEBI and submitted that the

proposal of the bank was not in conformity with the aforesaid circular, which relates to preferential allotment to selected group of persons. On the

other hand, according to the learned Counsel for the petitioner/appellant, the circular is not applicable to rights issue.

11.

We have noticed the different guidelines issued by Government of India, RBI and SEBI, relevant portions of which have been quoted above. If

the guideline issued by Government of India, RBI and SEBI are read together, it will be evident that they cover different fields and are not contrary

to each other. The guideline issued by the Ministry of Finance, Department of Economic Affairs, Government of India dated 1st Aug., 1985,

relates to reservation of issue of capital in favour of the employees keeping in view the announcement made by the Finance Minister during his

budget speech on 16th March, 1985. On introduction of stock option scheme for employees, it was decided by Government of India that while

proposing a further issue of capital, they should make a reservation of 5% of the further issue to their employees/workers on an equitable basis.

So far as the guideline issued by RBI dated 17th June, 1994 is concerned, it is binding on the bank, having issued in exercise of power conferred

u/s 35A of the Banking Regulation Act, 1959. Clause (i) of Para-3 relates to public issues, which should not be less than that based on the net

asset value and profit earning capacity value according to the guidelines of erstwhile Controller of Capital Issues in December, 1990. Clause (ii) of

Para-3 relates to preferential issue of shares, which has been discouraged, but could be permitted by banks to make such allotments selectively to

prevent destabilisation of the well performing management with certain conditions as mentioned therein. Clause (iii) of Para-3 relates to ""rights issue

and special allotment to employees"", as quoted hereunder:

iii) Rights issue and special allotment to employees

In order to ensure that adequate reserves are built up, in the case of rights issue to all such shareholders or special allotment to employees, the

price should not be less than half of the price fixed for the public issue determined according to the CCI formula of December, 1990. On the other

hand, Clause (iv) of Para-3 relates to bonus issues and Para-4 relates to permission of RBI for determination of the price of various categories of

shares.

12.

In the present case, we are not concerned with public issue or preferential issue of shares or bonus issue as contained in Clauses (i), (ii) and

(iv) of Para-3. The present case relates only to ''rights issue and special allotment to employees''. According to the guideline, in order to ensure that

adequate resources are built up, in case of ""rights issue"" of share holders and special allotment to the employees, price should not be less than half

of the price fixed for public issue, determined according to the CCI formula of December, 1990. It has nothing to do with ""preferential issue"",

allotment to which cannot be made less than the market value of the shares to be determined on the basis of their average price during the

immediate preceding six months at the main listing centres. The price of share is calculated for public issues, which is also applicable for rights

issues and special allotment to employees. It is completely different than the mode of calculation of price of shares of preferential issues.

The guideline of SEBI, No. 7 dated 5th Aug., 1994, relates to pricing of issues of shares on ''preferential basis and preferential allotment to

Foreign Institutional Investors'' and are governed by the guidelines issued by the Government of India, SEBI and RBI. Clause (4), i.e., pricing of

issues of shares on preferential basis is not concerned with rights issue and special allotment to the employees, which is based on public issues.

Clause (12) of the said guideline of SEBI dated 5th Aug., 1994, also do not relate to employees of the bank but to foreign institutional investors.

13.

Learned Counsel for SEBI could not lay hand on any provision to suggest how the guideline dated 5th Aug., 1994, is attracted in the case of

rights issue and special allotment to employees of the bank, price of which is to be fixed as per public issue. He also could not point out how the

mode of fixation of price of preferential issue of share has anything to do with rights issue and special allotment to employees, which is based on

public issue.

Therefore, it will be evident that the guideline issued by the Government of India dated 1st Aug., 1985, while relates to reservation of 5% of the

further issues in favour of the employees/workers on equitable basis, the statutory guideline issued by RBI dated 17th June, 1994, which is also

binding on the bank, Clause (iii) of para-3 therein is applicable in the present case, which relates to rights issue and special allotment to employees.

The guideline dated 5th Aug., 1994, issued by SEBI do not cover the field of rights issue and special allotment to employees and thus the rejection

as made by SEBI while refusing approval by impugned letter dated 11th Jan., 1997, cannot be upheld, the reasons given therein being bad in law.

14.

Counsel for the parties brought to our notice the said guideline issued by the Reserve Bank of India on 20th March, 2002, vide letter Ref.

DBOD. No. PSBS.BC.79/16.13.100/2001-2002. Therein giving reference to earlier guidelines dated 17th June, 1994 and 10th July, 1999,

instructions have been given as to how pricing of shares of private sector banks, rights issue and preferential issue were to be fixed, as quoted

hereunder:

Issue and pricing of shares by private sector banks

Please refer to our circulars DBOD.No. BC.76/16.13.100/94 dated June 17, 1994 and DBOD.No. PSBS.BC.72/16.13.100/98-99 dated July

10, 1998 respectively, in terms of which guidelines on issue and pricing of shares had been prescribed. In terms of extant instructions, banks in

private sector, whose shares are not listed on the stock exchanges, are required to obtain prior approval of Reserve Bank of India (RBI) for issue

of all types of shares, viz., public, preferential, rights/special allotment to employees and bonus shares. However, banks whose shares are listed on

the stock exchanges need not seek prior approval of RBI for issue of shares except bonus shares, which is to be linked with rights/public issues by

all the banks in private sector. The matter has since been reviewed and issue and pricing of shares by private sector banks would be governed by

the following guidelines.

***

3.

Rights Issues:

RBI approval would not be required for rights issues by both listed and unlisted banks.

***

5.

Preferential Issue:

All preferential issues would require prior approval of RBI. Pricing of preferential issues by listed banks be as per SEBI formula, while for unlisted

banks the fair value may be determined by a chartered accountant or a merchant banker.

From the aforesaid guidelines issued by RBI, it will be clear that shares and special allotment can be made in favour of the employees of the bank,

including bonus shares and prior approval of RBI is required only in case the bank is not listed on the stock exchange.

15.

Learned Counsel appearing on behalf of the respondent/SEBI submitted that the notice which was published for issuance of shares have now

been sold in favour of others and thus it was suggested that the writ petition has become infructuous, but we do not subscribe to such submission

as the ratio laid down by us will cover the future allotment, if made by bank, which may make special allotment of shares and bonus shares in

favour of its employees having regard to the guidelines issued by Government of India and RBI.

We, accordingly, set aside the impugned letter dated 11th Jan., 1995, issued by SEBI and remit the case to the respondents for determination on

grant of rights issue and special allotment of shares to its employees, if made in future, in accordance with reservation as made by Government of

India and at a price to be fixed as per guidelines of the RBI. The writ appeal is allowed with aforesaid observation. However, there shall be no

order as to costs.