High CourtsDivision Bench(1878) 04 CAL CK 0019

The Empress vs Gangadhur Bhunjo and Others

Calcutta High Court · Decided on 16 April 1878 · Citation: (1878) ILR (Cal) 622

HON’BLE JUDGES
Prinsep, J · Markby, J

CourtKutchehry membership

More clarity. Every judgment.

Download court copies, explore connected cases and make more of every research session.

Loading membership options…

Ask AI about this case

AI Structured Summary

Not yet generated for this judgment

Judgment

2 paragraphs · 133 words

Prinsep, J.—These cases have been submitted to us by the Sessions Judge of Midnapore, because sentences of fine have been imposed by the Magistrate of the Division of Contai for breaches of the stamp law contrary to the rule laid down in the case of the Queen v. Nadi Chanel Poddar 24 W.R. Cr. Rul. 1.

2.

It appears that the Collector authorized this officer, u/s 43 of the Stamp Act, to institute and conduct the prosecution in these cases. Under these circumstances we think that he was not competent also to try them. Any possible inconvenience might have been obviated by the Collector''s employing the Government pleader or some other person to conduct the prosecution u/s 43. We quash the convictions and sentences, and direct that the fines, if paid, be refunded.