High CourtsDivision Bench(2005) 03 MAD CK 0059

The District Collector and The Assistant Commissioner (Excise) vs T.A. Ranjan

Madras High Court · Decided on 18 March 2005

HON’BLE JUDGES
Markandey Katju, C.J · Prabha Sridevan, J
RESULT
Dismissed
CASE NUMBER
W.A. No''s. 2299, 2813, 4123-4125, 4163 and 29279 of 2003 and 168 and 169 of 2004

CourtKutchehry membership

More clarity. Every judgment.

Download court copies, explore connected cases and make more of every research session.

Loading membership options…

Ask AI about this case

AI Structured Summary

Not yet generated for this judgment

Judgment

10 paragraphs · 191 words

Markandey Katju, C.J.—These writ appeals are filed against the common order dated 16-12-2002 passed by the learned single Judge.

2.

It is not necessary to deal with the background of these cases, but we may briefly mention that the controversy involves in these matters is the

request for refund by the writ petitioners/appellants of the privilege amount, licence fee and security deposit paid by them in respect of the liquor

shops.

3.

Admittedly in identical circumstances, refunds of the said amounts have been granted in the case of Tambaram Municipality, Madipakkam

Village Panchayat and Ayyappanthangal Village Municipality pursuant to the orders of this Court and such persons have been given the refund

also. We, therefore, are of the opinion that there should be parity and uniformity in such matters and since the writ-petitioners/appellants herein are

similarly situate, they should also given the refund of the aforesaid amounts paid by them.

4.

There is no force in these appeals. The writ appeals are dismissed. The refund shall be made within one month from today. W.P. No.29279 is

allowed. Connected WAMP Nos.3374, 4407, 342-345 of 2003, 276 and 277 of 2004 are closed.