High CourtsDivision Bench(2010) 07 DEL CK 0161

The Commissioner of Income Tax-II vs Mrs. Kusum Gupta

Delhi High Court · Decided on 16 July 2010

HON’BLE JUDGES
Dipak Misra, C.J · Manmohan, J
RESULT
Dismissed
CASE NUMBER
ITA 831 of 2010

CourtKutchehry membership

More clarity. Every judgment.

Download court copies, explore connected cases and make more of every research session.

Loading membership options…

Ask AI about this case

AI Structured Summary

Not yet generated for this judgment

Judgment

10 paragraphs · 261 words

Manmohan, J.

CM APPL. 11720/2010

This is an application for condonation of delay of 197 days in refiling the appeal.

For the reasons stated in the application, delay of 197 days in refiling the appeal is condoned.

Accordingly, application stands disposed of.

ITA 831/2010

1.

Present appeal has been filed u/s 260A of Income Tax Act, 1961 (for brevity "Act 1961") against the order dated 24th October, 2008 passed by the Income Tax Appellate Tribunal, Delhi (in short "ITAT") relating to the assessment year 2001-2002.

2.

Ms. Sonia Mathur, learned Counsel for revenue submitted that ITAT erroneously deleted the addition of Rs. 60,00,000/- made by the Assessing Officer on account of unexplained gifts received by the assessee during the relevant accounting period. She further submitted that ITAT had not appreciated all the surroundings circumstances as the gifts did not meet test of human probabilities.

3.

However, we find that not only was the genuineness of the two gifts established inasmuch as registered gift deeds were produced but also the statements of two donors along with the assessee were recorded. In fact, the tribunal in the impugned order has concluded on facts that the identity and creditworthiness of the donors was proved beyond doubt.

4.

In our opinion, as gifts were made by way of registered gift deeds as well as payments were made by way of account payee cheques and both the donors are income tax assesses, it cannot be said that the gifts are not genuine. Resultantly, the appeal stands dismissed in limine but with no order as to costs.