High CourtsDivision Bench(2006) 06 MAD CK 0197

The Commissioner of Collegiate Education and The Principal, Loganathan Narayanaswamy Government College vs Janakiraman and The Presiding Officer, Principal Labour Court

Madras High Court · Decided on 15 June 2006

HON’BLE JUDGES
V. Dhanapalan, J · P. Sathasivam, J
RESULT
Dismissed
CASE NUMBER
Writ Appeal No. 1257 of 2001

CourtKutchehry membership

More clarity. Every judgment.

Download court copies, explore connected cases and make more of every research session.

Loading membership options…

Ask AI about this case

AI Structured Summary

Not yet generated for this judgment

Judgment

12 paragraphs · 261 words

P. Sathasivam, J.—The above Writ Appeal has been filed against the order of the learned single Judge, dated 07.12.1998, made in W.M.P.

No. 20993 of 1998 in W.P. No. 21142 of 1994.

2.

It is not in dispute that questioning the order of the Principal Labour Court, Chennai, dated 27.01.1994, made in I.D. No. 490 of 1990, granting

the relief of reinstatement with back wages in favour of the first respondent herein, the Commissioner of Collegiate Education and the Principal,

Loganathan Narayanaswamy Government College, filed W.P. No. 21142 of 1994. Pending Writ Petition, they sought for stay of the order of the

Labour Court. While considering the same, taking note of the provisions of Section 17B of the Industrial Disputes Act, the learned Judge directed

the Writ Petitioners to deposit a sum of Rs. 1,00,000/- with the Labour Court, Chennai, within a period of twelve weeks. In the same order, the

learned Judge directed the Labour Court to invest the said amount in a Nationalised bank. The workman/first respondent herein, viz., N.

Janakiraman, was permitted to withdraw interest on the said amount once in six months. Apart from the said direction, the learned Judge also

directed the Management to pay at the rate of Rs. 850/- per month in favour of the workman from the date of writ petition till its disposal.

3.

In view of the order of the Labour Court and the provisions of Section 17B of the Industrial Disputes Act, we do not find any ground for

interference. Accordingly, the Writ Appeal fails and the same is dismissed.