High CourtsSINGLE BENCH(2017) 03 RAJ CK 0020

The Chairman cum Managing Director vs Sohan Lal Rajpurohit s/o Shri Mohan Lal Rajpurohit

Rajasthan High Court · Decided on 6 March 2017

HON’BLE JUDGES
Pushpendra Singh Bhati
RESULT
Allowed
CASE NUMBER
205 of 2013

CourtKutchehry membership

More clarity. Every judgment.

Download court copies, explore connected cases and make more of every research session.

Loading membership options…

Ask AI about this case

AI Structured Summary

Not yet generated for this judgment

Judgment

35 paragraphs · 370 words
1.

By way of this appeal, the appellants have challenged the

judgment and order whereby the learned Single Judge has partly

allowed the writ petition preferred by the petitioner (respondent

herein) with the direction that the original petitioner be reinstated

with 50% back wages from 05.08.1992 to 31.12.2007 and the

pensionary benefits also be given to him.

2.

Contention raised by the learned counsel for the appellants

in the appeal is that the respondent was convicted in a criminal

case from 1992 till his retirement. Therefore, there was no error

on the part of the appellants to relieve the respondent from

service. In that view of the matter, during the period he was

convicted, since he has not worked, he is not entitled for back

wages. He has further contended that he could have been given

the notional benefits. No other benefits can be granted.

3.

Learned counsel for the respondent has supported the order

passed by the learned Single Judge and contended that the

termination order was passed by the appellants on the basis of his

conviction in a criminal case and since he has been acquitted in

the aforesaid case, he was entitled to the back wages.

4.

Heard learned counsel for the parties.

Taking into consideration the fact that the respondent was

convicted on 19.06.1992, retired on 31.12.2007 and acquitted by

this Court on 27.11.2008 and till the judgment of the High Court

in 2008, he attained the age of retirement, in our considered

opinion, there was no error on the part of the appellant

Management to relieve him. However, now in view of the order of

the learned Single Judge, he will be given only notional benefits

from 05.08.1992 till 31.12.2007 and after that actual benefits of

pension etc. will be granted within a period of two months from

today with all consequential benefits. The arrears should be paid

from 01.01.2008 till 28.02.2017 within a period of three months.

If the amount is not paid, he will be entitled to interest at the rate

of 9% per annum from 01.01.2008 on monthly basis and interest

will be recovered from the Officer who is dealing with the matter.

5.

The appeal is allowed to the aforesaid extent.