High CourtsSingle Bench(2011) 08 MAD CK 0515

The Assistant Director, Handloom and Textiles and T.T. 70 Thiruvalluvar Saliyar-Weavers Co-operative Society vs The Co-operative Tribunal-cum-Principal and Others

Madras High Court · Decided on 3 August 2011

HON’BLE JUDGES
Vinod K. Sharma, J
RESULT
Dismissed
CASE NUMBER
Writ Petition (MD) No. 3093 of 2006 and W.P. MP (MD) No. 3351 of 2006

CourtKutchehry membership

More clarity. Every judgment.

Download court copies, explore connected cases and make more of every research session.

Loading membership options…

Ask AI about this case

AI Structured Summary

Not yet generated for this judgment

Judgment

11 paragraphs · 367 words

Vinod K. Sharma, J.—The Petitioner has challenged the order passed by the learned Principal District Judge, Madurai, exercising the powers of Appellate Authority, under the Tamil Nadu Co-operative Societies Act.

2.

The Respondents 2 to 5 were asked to make good the loss caused to the Society, in pursuance to the proceedings, held u/s 87 of the Tamil Nadu Cooperative Societies Act.

3.

The appellate authority allowed the appeal only on the ground that the proceedings u/s 87 of the Act, were not completed, within a period of six months, as stipulated under proviso (2) to Section 87 of the Tamil Nadu Cooperative Societies Act, 1983.

4.

Proviso (2) to Section 87 reads as under:

Provided further that the action commenced under this Sub-section shall be completed within a period of six months from the date of such commencement or such further period or periods as the next higher authority may permit but such extended period or periods shall not exceed six months in the aggregate

5.

The reading of the proviso shows that the period six months is not mandatory, as proviso itself stipulates that the time can be extended.

6.

The learned Principal District Judge, exercising the power of appellate authority, committed an error, by treating the claim to be time barred, by holding that proviso (2) to Section 87 to be mandatory.

7.

As already observed above, proviso (2) to Section 87 cannot be held to be mandatory.

8.

This view finds support from the judgment of this Court, in the case of K. Murugan v. 1. The Deputy Registrar of Cooperative Societies, Erode Circle, Veerappan Chattram, Erode-4 and Ors. 2001 (3) CTC 689 and the judgment of this Court in G. Pannerselvam v. Registrar of Coop. Societies (2009) 2 MLJ 901. The impugned order of appellate authority, therefore, cannot be sustained in law.

9.

The writ petition is, accordingly, allowed, the order of the appellate authority, is quashed and the case is remitted back to the learned Principal District Judge, Madurai, exercising the power of appellate authority, under the Tamil Nadu Cooperative Societies Act, to decide the appeal on merits, in accordance with law.

10.

Consequently, connected Miscellaneous Petition is closed. No costs.