High CourtsSingle Bench(2011) 11 MAD CK 0002

Thangapandian vs Thayammal @ Esakkiammal

Madras High Court · Decided on 8 November 2011

HON’BLE JUDGES
M. Jaichandren, J
RESULT
Dismissed
CASE NUMBER
C.R.P.PD (MD) . 1168 of 2009 and M.P. No. 1 of 2009

CourtKutchehry membership

More clarity. Every judgment.

Download court copies, explore connected cases and make more of every research session.

Loading membership options…

CourtKutchehry membership

More clarity. Every judgment.

Download court copies, explore connected cases and make more of every research session.

Loading membership options…

Ask AI about this case

AI Structured Summary

Not yet generated for this judgment

Judgment

21 paragraphs · 444 words

Honourable Mr. Justice M. Jaichandren

1.

This Civil Revision Petition has been filed against the order, dated 18.2.2009, made in I.A. No. 309 of 2007, in O.S. No. 195 of 2003, on the

file of the Subordinate Court, Ambasamudram.

2.

The petitioner in the present Civil Revision Petition is the third defendant in the suit, in O.S. No. 195 of 2003, filed by the respondent, for the

partition of the suit properties. Originally, the suit had been filed, in O.S. No. 25 of 1998, on the file of the District Munsif Court, Ambasamudram.

However, the District Munsif Court, Ambasamudram, had returned the suit, for being presented before the Subordinate Court, Ambasamudram,

due to its lack of pecuniary jurisdiction to hear the same. Thereafter, the petitioner had preferred an interlocutory application, in I.A. No. 309 of

2007, praying that he should be permitted to file a fresh written statement treating the suit filed before the subordinate Court, as a fresh suit. The

trial Court had refused to permit the petitioner to do so, by its order, dated 18.2.2009, stating that a written statement had already been filed and

the issues had also been framed and the suit was to be taken up for trial. In such circumstances, the petitioner has preferred the present civil

revision petition, challenging the said order passed by the Subordinate Court, Ambasamudram, on 18.2.2009.

3.

At this stage of the hearing of the civil revision petition the learned counsel appearing on behalf of the respondent had submitted that this Court

may pass an order permitting the petitioner to file an additional written statement, in the suit, in O.S. No. 195 of 2003, before the Subordinate

Court, Ambasamudram, if he is so advised and to direct the Subordinate Court, Ambasamudram, to take up the suit for trial and to dispose of the

same, expeditiously.

4.

In view of the said submission made by the learned counsel appearing on behalf of the respondent the order, dated 18.2.2009, made in I.A.

No. 309 of 2007, in O.S. No. 195 of 2003, is set aside and the Subordinate Court, Ambasumudram, is directed to permit the petitioner to file an

additional written statement in the suit, in O.S. No. 195 of 2003 and to hear and dispose of the said suit, in accordance with law, as expeditiously

as possible, not later than six months from the date of receipt of a copy of this order. The additional written statement is to be filed by the

petitioner, the third defendant in the said suit, within a period of four weeks from today. The Civil Revision Petition is ordered accordingly. No

costs. Consequently, connected miscellaneous petition is closed.