Tribunals and Commissions(1994) 11 NCDRC CK 0007

TELECOMMUNICATION DISTRICT MANAGER, PANAJI vs ALOYSIUS BRAGANZA

National Consumer Disputes Redressal Commission · Decided on 11 November 1994 · Citation: 1994 0 NCDRC 46 : 1995 1 CLT 451

HON’BLE JUDGES
V.BALAKRISHNA ERADI , Y.KRISHAN , B.S.YADAV J.

CourtKutchehry membership

More clarity. Every judgment.

Download court copies, explore connected cases and make more of every research session.

Loading membership options…

Ask AI about this case

AI Structured Summary

Not yet generated for this judgment

Judgment

2 paragraphs · 231 words
1.

AFTER hearing both sides we are clearly of the view that the State Commission has acted wholly without jurisdiction in purporting to quash the bill issued by the Telephone Department for Rs 1535/- when there was absolutely no material before it to show that the said bill was defective in any respect. The award of Rs. 7000/- as compensation to the Complainant was also totally unjustified and manifestly arbitrary.

2.

HAVING regard to all the facts and circumstances of the case we consider that the interests of justice would be adequately met if a direction is issued to the Telephone Department to reconnect the telephone of the Complainant on his paying the sum of Rs. 1535/- to the Department within a period of one month from today. The reconnection shall be made within 7 days of the payment of the said amount of Rs. 1535/--In the special circumstances of the case the Telephone Department is directed not to levy any rental charges from the Complainant for the period during which the Telephone had been under disconnection as we are not satisfied that the bill for Rs. 1535/- had been duly served on the subscriber. No reconnection fee shall also be charged from the Complainant. These directions will be in substitution of the orders passed by the State Commission and the District Forum which will stand hereby set aside. No costs.