High CourtsDivision Bench(1917) 01 CAL CK 0053

Tekat Mal Oswal vs Ananda Moy Basu

Calcutta High Court · Decided on 9 January 1917 · Citation: 38 Ind. Cas. 226

HON’BLE JUDGES
Richardson, J · Fletcher, J

CourtKutchehry membership

More clarity. Every judgment.

Download court copies, explore connected cases and make more of every research session.

Loading membership options…

Ask AI about this case

AI Structured Summary

Not yet generated for this judgment

Judgment

1 paragraphs · 67 words
1.

This Rule must be discharged. The point now sought to be raised on behalf of the petitioner was never raised in the Court below and the mere fact that one or the parties did not sign the petition of reference is not conclusive that he was not a party to the case sent to the arbitrators. The Rule is accordingly discharged with costs, two gold mohurs.