High CourtsSingle Bench(2011) 09 SHI CK 0079

Tek Chand and Others vs Jai Nand Sharma and Another

High Court Of Himachal Pradesh · Decided on 14 September 2011

HON’BLE JUDGES
Deepak Gupta, J
RESULT
Allowed
CASE NUMBER
CMPMO No. 247 of 2010

CourtKutchehry membership

More clarity. Every judgment.

Download court copies, explore connected cases and make more of every research session.

Loading membership options…

Ask AI about this case

AI Structured Summary

Not yet generated for this judgment

Judgment

4 paragraphs · 267 words

Deepak Gupta, J.—The report of the Local Commissioner perused. As per this report, the judgment debtors (Petitioners herein) have made adequate arrangements for discharge of rain water and sewage etc. emanating from their house. According to the Local Commissioner, he has found that there is some foul water emanating in the property of the Plaintiff, but the water is probably not contaminated with sewage because the bacteriological contamination in the water was only 18 MPN and in case it had been contaminated with sewage the bacteriological contamination would have been much higher.

2.

According to the Local Commissioner the water which is coming into the patch of the Plaintiff''s land probably does not come from the construction of the Defendants. Since the source of the foul water is underground he could not definitely state as to from where the foul water is coming.

3.

Obviously, these disputed questions cannot be looked into in an execution proceeding. As per the Local Commissioner, the judgment debtors have complied with the judgment and decree passed against them in letter and spirit. Therefore, the petition is allowed and the execution petition is disposed of as having been satisfied. It is, however, clarified that the Plaintiff shall be at liberty to establish his allegations in a separate civil suit by leading evidence that the source of foul water emanating in their land is from the land of the Defendants. Obviously the parties shall be at liberty to contest the suit on all the grounds that may be available to them.

4.

The petition is disposed of in the aforesaid terMs. No. costs.