High CourtsSingle Bench(2021) 07 CAL CK 0040

T.E. Thomson And Co. Ltd. vs Ams Living Pvt. Ltd

Calcutta High Court · Decided on 15 July 2021

HON’BLE JUDGES
Moushumi Bhattacharya, J
CASE NUMBER
IA NO: GA/1/2021 In Civil Suit No. 119 Of 2021

CourtKutchehry membership

More clarity. Every judgment.

Download court copies, explore connected cases and make more of every research session.

Loading membership options…

Ask AI about this case

AI Structured Summary

Not yet generated for this judgment

Judgment

22 paragraphs · 490 words

The petitioner prays for an order against the respondent restraining the respondent from creating any third party interest in respect of the part of the

licensed portion which is presently being occupied by the respondent. The petitioner is the landlord of the premises and according to the learned

counsel appearing for the petitioner, the respondent is a trespasser pursuant to a notice of eviction dated 11th June, 2021 which was served on the

respondent by post as well as by e-mail.

Counsel submits that the respondent is in default of its payment obligations under leave and licence agreement which was entered into between the

parties on 1st December, 2020 and is to remain valid till 31st October, 2021. Under the relevant clause relating to non-payment of the leave and

licence fees, the respondent would be in default if the amount remains due and payable for a continued period of two months. The said default would

entitle the landlord/licensor to determine or terminate the licence agreement without prior notice. The event of default and the respondent’s failure

to make payment of the licence fees for over two months would appear from the notice dated 11th June, 2021 which states that as on the date of

issue of the notice, the respondent was in default for a continued period of three months. It is further stated that the licence fees tendered for the

month of April 2021 by way of a cheque was subsequently dishonored. By the said notice, the respondent was given 15 days from the date of the

notice to vacate the premises but has failed to do so. The respondent is still in occupation of the said premises.

The petitioner seeks leave to move this application ex-parte on the apprehension that the respondent is in the process of creating third party rights over

the occupied portion of the premises. Such apprehension has been stated in the present application.

Upon hearing learned counsel, this Court is of the view that the petitioner has established a prima facie case of default on the part of the respondent

which would entitle the petitioner to an order of injunction against the respondent for limited period of time within which the respondent should be

served. There is no challenge or response to the Notice of eviction. The fact of default of payment of licence fees is also not disputed. The default is

in fact a continuing default.

In view of the above, there shall be an order in terms of prayer (a) of the application restraining the respondent from alienating or creating any third

party rights in respect of the portion which is presently being occupied by the respondent. The order shall remain in force for a period of three weeks

from date. The petitioner is directed to serve a copy of this order together with all relevant documents within 24 hours from the date of this order.

List this matter after two weeks.