High CourtsSingle Bench(2010) 11 KL CK 0308

T.D. Saji vs Biju. K.D, Santhosh Kumar K.V and The National Insurance Company Ltd.

High Court Of Kerala · Decided on 1 November 2010

HON’BLE JUDGES
M.N. Krishnan, J
CASE NUMBER
M.A.C.A. No. 1800 of 2010

CourtKutchehry membership

More clarity. Every judgment.

Download court copies, explore connected cases and make more of every research session.

Loading membership options…

Ask AI about this case

AI Structured Summary

Not yet generated for this judgment

Judgment

16 paragraphs · 397 words

M.N. Krishnan, J.—This appeal is preferred against the award of the Motor Accidents Claims Tribunal, Perumbavoor in O.P.

(MV)1545/01. It is the case of the claimant that while he was attempting to board into the bus, the bus moved swiftly and that resulted in the

accident. The issue before me is regarding the right of recovery by the insurance company. The contentions are that there is no valid permit for the

bus and no valid licence and badge for the driver. As usual the owner and driver did not co-operate with the Tribunal to enter into a finding and

that has resulted in the filing of this appeal.

2.

The learned Counsel along with the memorandum of appeal had produced two annexures one with respect to the driving licence and the other

with respect to the permit. They are only copies and if they are true it will be a good case for the appellant. A perusal of Annexure 1 would reveal

that the driver of the bus did have a badge from 22.12.97 and licence has been issued to him in the year 1995. The accident had taken place in the

year 2001. If the badge is for a period of 5 years then there would have been a valid badge on the date of accident. So also the certificate issued

would reveal that there was a valid permit from 3.5.00 to 5.5.05. So these are materials which requires consideration when original documents are

produced and evidence is adduced. Therefore I am inclined to grant an opportunity. The award under challenge is set aside so far as it relates to

the interse liability between the insurance company and the owner is concerned with a direction to the Tribunal to permit the appellant to produce

documentary as well as oral evidence in support of his contentions. Needless to say the insurance company shall also be permitted to produce

documentary as well as oral evidence. If the driver co-operates it can also be looked into and the matter be disposed of in accordance with law.

Till that time no coercive proceedings is to be initiated and if initiated let it be stalled till the disposal of this matter Parties are directed to appear

before the Tribunal on 17.12.10 and the appellant is directed to take out notice to the insurance company for a proper disposal of the matter.