High CourtsSingle Bench(2018) 05 DEL CK 0153

TAYYAB ALI vs THE STATE GOVT. OF NCT OF DELHI

Delhi High Court · Decided on 14 May 2018

HON’BLE JUDGES
SANJEEV SACHDEVA
RESULT
Disposed Of
CASE NUMBER
BAIL APPLN. 26 OF 2018

CourtKutchehry membership

More clarity. Every judgment.

Download court copies, explore connected cases and make more of every research session.

Loading membership options…

CourtKutchehry membership

More clarity. Every judgment.

Download court copies, explore connected cases and make more of every research session.

Loading membership options…

Ask AI about this case

AI Structured Summary

Not yet generated for this judgment

Judgment

19 paragraphs · 297 words

@GMENTTAG-JUDGMENT

SANJEEV SACHDEVA, J.

1.Petitioner seeks anticipatory bail in FIR No.1434/2017, Police Station Mangolpuri, under Sections 341/308/323/34 IPC. The subject FIR has

been registered on the complaint of one Sunny alias Sunil, son of late Shri Ranjeet Singh.

2.It is the case of the petitioner that the entire incident occurred on account of instigation of the complainant and his family members and the

allegations in the subject FIR are false.

3.It is further contended that the entire incident has been recorded in the CCTV Cameras, which were in the concerned area. As per the

petitioner, the CCTV footage shows that the complainant and his family members came prepared with the rods and lathis and entered into an

altercation with the petitioner and his family members, who were assaulted.

4.An FIR is also stated to have been lodged on the complaint of one Shakil, the brother of the petitioner.

5.The petitioner was granted interim protection on 08th January 2018 by this Court. Learned APP for the state submits that the petitioner joined

investigation as per the directions of the IO.

6.Without commenting upon the merits of the case, perusal of the record shows that the petitioner has made out a case for grant of anticipatory

bail. In the event of arrest, the petitioner shall be released on bail by the Arresting Officer/Investigating Officer/SHO, on his furnishing a bail

bond in the sum of Rs.25,000/- with one surety of the like amount to the satisfaction of the Arresting Officer/Investigating Officer/SHO.

7.The petitioner shall not do anything, which may prejudice either the investigation or any of the prosecution witnesses. The petitioner shall join

investigation, as and when so required by the Investigating Officer.

8.Petition is disposed of in the above terms.

9.Order Dasti under the signatures of the Court Master.