Tribunals and CommissionsDivision Bench(2022) 09 TDSAT CK 0080

Tata Play Ltd vs Brand Value Communications Ltd

Telecom Disputes Settlement And Appellate Tribunal · Decided on 27 September 2022

HON’BLE JUDGES
Dhirubhai Naranbhai Patel, Chairperson · Subodh Kumar Gupta, Member
RESULT
Disposed Of
CASE NUMBER
E .A No. 9 Of 2015 In Broadcasting Petition No. 357 Of 2013 With Misc Application No. 485 Of 2016

CourtKutchehry membership

More clarity. Every judgment.

Download court copies, explore connected cases and make more of every research session.

Loading membership options…

Ask AI about this case

AI Structured Summary

Not yet generated for this judgment

Judgment

6 paragraphs · 180 words

M A. No. 355 of 2022

This application has been preferred by the decree holder for change of name of the company.  When the matter is called out we have heard the counsel for the applicant – decree holder.  Nobody appears on behalf of the petitioner or judgement debtor.

Having heard counsel for the applicant and looking to the facts and circumstances of the case, it appears that the name of the decree holder has been changed from Tata Sky Limited to “Tata Play Limited" with effect from 19.1.2022 and the certificate of incorporation is also annexed with memo of the application at Annexure A/1.

In view of these facts, this M.A. is hereby allowed and disposed of.

The name of the decree holder is hereby permitted to be changed as "Tata Play Limited."  Amended memo of the parties to Execution Application is already filed along with the M.A. which is taken on record.

As nobody appears for the judgment debtor, with a view to give one more chance to the judgment debtor, the matter is hereby adjourned to 22.11.2022.