High CourtsSingle Bench(2022) 02 RAJ CK 0006

Tarun Mali S/O Likhmaram vs State Of Rajasthan

Rajasthan High Court · Decided on 3 February 2022

HON’BLE JUDGES
Devendra Kachhawaha, J
RESULT
Allowed
CASE NUMBER
S.B. Criminal Miscellaneous Bail Application No. 66 Of 2022

CourtKutchehry membership

More clarity. Every judgment.

Download court copies, explore connected cases and make more of every research session.

Loading membership options…

Ask AI about this case

AI Structured Summary

Not yet generated for this judgment

Judgment

26 paragraphs · 479 words

Devendra Kachhawaha, J

In wake of onslaught of COVID-19, as per guidelines, lawyers have been advised to refrain from coming to the Courts, therefore, hearing of the

matter is being taken up only through video conferencing.

The present bail application has been filed under Section 439 Cr.P.C. on behalf of the petitioner, who is in judicial custody in connection with F.I.R.

No.290/2021, Police Station Marwar Junction, District Pali, registered for the offence punishable under Sections 384 & 354 of the Indian Penal Code

and Section 67 of the I.T. Act.

Heard learned counsel for the petitioner through video conferencing and learned Public Prosecutor, present-in-person. Perused the material available

on record.

Learned counsel for the petitioner stated that one agreement in regard to sale of a property has been exhibited between Pushpa Devi, mother of the

complainant and Lakhma Ram, father of the petitioner; amount of sale consideration is Rs. 22,00,000/- and Rs. 12,00,000/- have been paid at the time

of execution of agreement and remaining amount has to be paid before 31.12.2019 but, the same has not been paid by complainant side; petitioner has

falsely been implicated in this case; mobile number mentioned in the FIR belongs to co-accused Deepak and not to the petitioner; petitioner is behind

the bars since 17.12.2021; father of the petitioner is suffering from cancer disease; no investigation or recovery is pending against the petitioner; and

trial will take time. With these submissions, learned counsel for the petitioner prayed that the benefit of bail may be granted to the petitioner.

Per contra, learned Public Prosecutor has vehemently opposed the bail application of the accused-petitioner and stated that some objectionable

photographs of the complainant have allegedly been uploaded on Instagram by the accused-petitioner which has defamed the complainant victim

‘P’.

Having regard to the facts and circumstances of the case, particularly looking to the Hindi translation copy of the agreement of sale executed between

the parties which is filed by learned counsel for the petitioner; illness of the father of the accused-petitioner; accused-petitioner is behind the bars since

17.12.2021; no investigation or recovery is pending against the accused-petitioner; and trial will take sufficiently long time, therefore, without

expressing any opinion on the merits/demerits of the case, this Court is of the opinion that the bail application filed by the petitioner deserves to be

accepted.

Consequently, the bail application is allowed. It is ordered that the petitioner, Tarun Mali S/o Likhmaram, arrested in connection with F.I.R.

No.290/2021, Police Station Marwar Junction, District Pali, shall be released on bail, if not wanted in any other case; provided he furnishes a personal

bond of Rs.50,000/- with two surety bonds of Rs.25,000/- each (one surety shall be a local) to the satisfaction of the learned trial court with the

stipulation to appear before that Court on all dates of hearing and as and when called upon to do so.