AI Structured Summary
Not yet generated for this judgment
Judgment
Manindra Mohan Shrivastava, J
The ground raised in this petition is that the petitioner has been wrongly declared as surplus.
Learned counsel for the petitioner would submit that in a case where similar ground was raised, a direction has been issued on 14.12.2017 in WPS
No.7127 of 2017 to examine the same and status quo has been directed to be maintained. It is submitted that the case f the petitioner is identical,
therefore, similar direction may be issued in this case.
Learned counsel for the State would submit that looking to the interest of educational session, direction may be confined for a limited period for
consideration.
Accordingly, the petition is disposed off with liberty to the petitioner in case the petitioner prefers representation within a period of 10 days from
today, the same shall be examined and order be passed within 20 days from the date of submission of representation. For a period of 30 days, status
quo as exists today, in respect of the petitioner's posting, shall be maintained.
It is made clear that this Court has not expressed any opinion on the merits of the case and the authority shall decide the matter, on its own merits,
strictly in accordance with law, without treating any observation made in this order, as opinion on the merits of the case.