High CourtsSingle Bench(2013) 09 P&H CK 0010

Tara Chand and Others vs State of Haryana and Others

Punjab And Haryana At Chandigarh · Decided on 9 September 2013

HON’BLE JUDGES
K. Kannan, J
RESULT
Disposed Off
CASE NUMBER
Civil Writ Petition No. 16462 of 1998 (O and M)

CourtKutchehry membership

More clarity. Every judgment.

Download court copies, explore connected cases and make more of every research session.

Loading membership options…

Ask AI about this case

AI Structured Summary

Not yet generated for this judgment

Judgment

2 paragraphs · 236 words

K. Kannan, J.—The petitioners have a grievance in the writ petition that they should be given higher scales on their acquiring higher qualifications as giani and prabhakar on the same scales which the Language teachers in Oriental courses like Sanskrit were given. This was held by the judgment of this Court in CWP No. 1718 of 1993, dated 31.03.1994 to be arbitrary. In terms of the said judgment, CWP No. 13560 of 1997 was also allowed giving benefit of higher grade admissible to Language Teachers having prabhakar and giani qualifications. The counsel states that higher scales were granted to all the teachers having prabhakar/giani qualifications, but in view of the Supreme Court judgment in State of Haryana and Others Vs. Sumitra Devi and Others, the benefit was extended only from the date when a fresh notification was issued and to those persons, past benefits from the date when the impugned notification was issued under P5 was not given. Since the petitioners'' grievance has been partly redeemed by a subsequent notification said to have been passed, as per the representation of the counsel for the State, I find that no further reliefs could be extended to the petitioners.

2.

There is no representation for the petitioners, but I have still proceeded to examine the case on merits and with the assistance of the counsel for the State. The writ petition is disposed of on the above observations.