High CourtsSingle Bench(2023) 01 UK CK 0119

Tanjeem vs State Of Uttarakhand

Uttarakhand High Court · Decided on 20 January 2023

HON’BLE JUDGES
Ravindra Maithani, J
RESULT
Allowed
CASE NUMBER
Anticipatory Bail Application No. 37 Of 2023

CourtKutchehry membership

More clarity. Every judgment.

Download court copies, explore connected cases and make more of every research session.

Loading membership options…

Ask AI about this case

AI Structured Summary

Not yet generated for this judgment

Judgment

11 paragraphs · 236 words

Ravindra Maithani, J

1.

Applicant Tanjeem has sought anticipatory bail in FIR No.12 of 2023, under Section 11 of the Prevention of Cruelty to Animals Act, 1960 and Sections 3/11 of the Uttarakhand Protection of Cow Progeny Act, 2007, Police Station Jhabreda, District Haridwar. He has sought his release on anticipatory bail.

2.

Heard learned counsel for the parties and perused the record.

3.

Having considered, this Court is of the view that it is a case fit for anticipatory bail and the applicant deserves to be enlarged on anticipatory bail.

4.

The anticipatory bail application is allowed.

5.

Let the applicant be released on anticipatory bail, on his executing a personal bond and furnishing two reliable sureties, each of the like amount, to the satisfaction of the court concerned. In addition to it, the applicant shall also comply with the following conditions:-

(i) The applicant shall co-operate with the investigation.

(ii) The applicant shall not approach any witness/victim in any manner, whatsoever.

(iii) The applicant shall not leave the country without prior permission of the concerned court.

(iv) The applicant shall deposit his passport with the Investigating Officer. The passport may only be returned by the order of the court concerned. In case, if he does not have passport, he shall give an undertaking to that effect to the Investigating Officer.

(v) The applicant shall also give an undertaking on (i), (ii) & (iii) above.