High CourtsDivision Bench(2022) 02 SHI CK 0061

Tamana Sharma vs State Of Himachal Pradesh And Others

High Court Of Himachal Pradesh · Decided on 25 February 2022

HON’BLE JUDGES
Mohammad Rafiq, CJ · Jyotsna Rewal Dua, J
RESULT
Disposed Of
CASE NUMBER
Civil Writ Petition No. 729 Of 2022

CourtKutchehry membership

More clarity. Every judgment.

Download court copies, explore connected cases and make more of every research session.

Loading membership options…

Ask AI about this case

AI Structured Summary

Not yet generated for this judgment

Judgment

5 paragraphs · 165 words

Mohammad Rafiq, CJ

1.

After making some arguments, the learned counsel for the petitioner seeks permission to withdraw the writ petition enabling the petitioner to approach the respondents to cover the Wards of Freedom Fighters, as per Clause 2(vi) contained in Chapter IV-Eligibility and Qualifications, as mentioned in the Common/Centralized Counselling Prospectus (Under-Graduate Medical/Dental Courses) for admission to MBBS & BDS Courses (Session 2021-22), Annexure P-1, alongside the children of bonafide Himachalis, who are serving In Indian Defence Services/Ex-serviceman/Para-Military Forces.

2.

It being a Policy matter, this Court cannot interfere TAMANA SHARMA VERSUS STATE OF HIMACHAL PRADESH AND OTHERS with the same. However, the petitioner is permitted to approach the respondents-State for redressal of her grievance(s) and it is for the respondents to take view in the matter, in accordance with law.

3.

We make it clear that we have not expressed any opinion on the merits of the case.

4.

The writ petition is disposed of accordingly, so also pending miscellaneous application(s), if any.