High CourtsSINGLE BENCH(2017) 12 JH CK 0019

Tajmul Sk., son of Abul Sk vs The State of Jharkhand

Jharkhand High Court · Decided on 13 December 2017

HON’BLE JUDGES
Shree Chandrashekhar
RESULT
Allowed
CASE NUMBER
8516 of 2017

CourtKutchehry membership

More clarity. Every judgment.

Download court copies, explore connected cases and make more of every research session.

Loading membership options…

Ask AI about this case

AI Structured Summary

Not yet generated for this judgment

Judgment

41 paragraphs · 423 words
1.

Opposing the prayer for grant of bail in S.T. No. 180 of

2017, Mr. V.S. Prasad, the learned APP submits that there is no fresh

ground pleaded by the petitioner after his previous attempt

vide B.A. No.4492 of 2017 failed on 19.07.2017.

2.

Mr. J.S. Singh, the learned counsel for the petitioner

submits that after charges were framed against the accused persons

on 07.06.2017 in G.R. Case No.365 of 2017 corresponding to Katras

(East Basuria) P.S. Case No.24 of 2017 which was registered for

offence punishable under Section 366 IPC, trial in S.T. No. 180 of

2017 has not progressed and, in fact, the matter was posted on as

many as 10 occasions, however, prosecution has failed to produce

any of its witnesses.

3.

It is contended that for an offence for which maximum

sentence prescribed is 10 years, the petitioner who has remained in

judicial custody since 06.02.2017, in the facts of the case, is entitled

for grant of bail. It is submitted that the victim who is a major

married woman could not have been forced to marry the petitioner

against her will and, in fact, when she was produced in the police

station she never made any complaint against the petitioner.

4.

The learned counsel for the petitioner has referred to

decision in "Hussain & Anr. Vs. Union of India" reported in

(2017) 5 SCC 702 to contend that speedy trial is an essential part of

Article 21 of the Constitution of India.

5.

In the facts and circumstances of the case, the petitioner

namely, Birendra Chouhan @ Birendra Kumar Chouhan, is directed

to be released on bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs.10,000/-(Rupees

ten thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the

satisfaction of the learned Additional Sessions Judge-V, Dhanbad in

connection with Katras (East Basuria) P.S. Case No.24 of 2017

corresponding to G.R. No.365 of 2017 on the following conditions:

(i) one of the bailers shall be class-I legal heir of the petitioner,

(ii) he shall appear before the trial court on each and every

date during trial, and

(iii) he shall not change his place of residence which shall be

physically verified by the investigating officer and a report thereof

shall be filed before the trial court.

6.

And on default of any of the conditions for grant of bail,

the prosecution shall file an application for cancellation of bail of the

petitioner.

7.

The instant application is allowed. Let a copy of the order

be transmitted to the trial Court through ''FAX''.