High CourtsSingle Bench(2026) 11 P&H CK 1820

Tajinder Kaur vs State Of Punjab & Ors.

Punjab And Haryana At Chandigarh · Decided on 11 November 2026

HON’BLE JUDGES
Yashvir Singh Rathor, J
RESULT
Disposed Of
CASE NUMBER
CRM-M-63368-2026

CourtKutchehry membership

More clarity. Every judgment.

Download court copies, explore connected cases and make more of every research session.

Loading membership options…

CourtKutchehry membership

More clarity. Every judgment.

Download court copies, explore connected cases and make more of every research session.

Loading membership options…

Ask AI about this case

AI Structured Summary

Not yet generated for this judgment

Judgment

7 paragraphs · 286 words

YASHVIR SINGH RATHOR, J. (Oral)

1.

The present petition has been filed under Section 528 of BNSS, 2023 for directing respondents No.1 and 2 to decide the representation dated 12.10.2026 (Annexure P-17) by transferring the inquiry arising out of complaint No.PGD 859244 dated 04.08.2026 (Annexure P-1) instituted by respondent No.7 pending before respondent No.6 of NRI Wing, Punjab Police and complaint No.592-PC dated 23.10.2026 (Annexure P-21) given by respondent No.9 arising out of the same family to the Bureau of Investigation, Punjab Police or any other independent and impartial senior police officer and to protect the life and liberty of the petitioner and her husband at the hands of respondents No.7 to 9.

2.

Notice of motion.

3.

On the asking of Court, Mr. Jasjit Singh Rattu, DAG, Punjab, accepts notice on behalf of the State and assures that respondent No.2-Director General of Police, Punjab would look into the representation dated 12.10.2026 (Annexure P-17).

4.

In view of the above, respondent No.2-Director General of Police, Punjab to assign the representation to some officer to the rank of SSP, who shall look into the representation and decide the same on the basis of threat perception felt by the petitioner and if the threat perception is found to be true then the protection as admissible in law shall be provided. In case, the concerned SSP is of the view that no protection is required, then a speaking order shall be passed and communicated to the petitioner. The concerned SSP is directed to decide the representation within a period of one month from the date of receipt of a certified copy of this order.

5.

Disposed of.

6.

Pending misc. application (s), if any, shall also stand disposed of.