High CourtsDivision Bench(2024) 10 DEL CK 1702

T Raghupathi Reddy vs Union Of India & Ors

Delhi High Court · Decided on 25 October 2024

HON’BLE JUDGES
Navin Chawla, J · Shalinder Kaur, J
RESULT
Disposed Of
CASE NUMBER
W.P.(C) 15076/2024

CourtKutchehry membership

More clarity. Every judgment.

Download court copies, explore connected cases and make more of every research session.

Loading membership options…

CourtKutchehry membership

More clarity. Every judgment.

Download court copies, explore connected cases and make more of every research session.

Loading membership options…

Ask AI about this case

AI Structured Summary

Not yet generated for this judgment

Judgment

13 paragraphs · 307 words

NAVIN CHAWLA, J. (Oral)

CM APPL. 63173/2024—Exp.

1.

Allowed, subject to just exceptions.

W.P.(C) 15076/2024

2.

This petition has been filed by the petitioner seeking the following reliefs:

“I. Issue writ of mandamus directing the Respondent No-3 to grant the petitioner voluntary retirement with consequential statutory/service benefits arising therein;

II. Issue writ of certiorari thereby quashing the order dated 27.06.2024 vide the letter issued by Dig, (CRPF), Welfare Block No. 1, CGO Complex, Lodhi Road, New Delhi-110003.”

3.

It is the case of the petitioner that by the Impugned Order dated 27.06.2024, merely on a request received from the complainant that the petitioner has not joined the investigation in regard to FIR bearing No.217/2019, the request of the petitioner for grant of voluntary retirement has been rejected stating that it may not be considered till the completion of the above case.

4.

The petitioner claims that he has joined the investigation and in pursuance to the same, he was not named as an accused in the Charge Sheet. Later, the petitioner was also made to undergo a polygraph test, which also the petitioner has undergone.

5.

Keeping in view the peculiar facts as stated by the petitioner, we are of the view that the respondents should consider the contents of the present petition as a representation of the petitioner for seeking voluntary retirement, and pass a speaking and reasoned order thereon, within a period of twelve weeks from today and communicate its decision to the petitioner.

6.

In case the petitioner is aggrieved of the decision taken by the respondents, it shall be open to the petitioner to challenge the same in accordance with law.

7.

We hereby make it clear that we have not expressed any opinion on the merits of the claims of the petitioner.

8.

The petition is disposed of in the above terms.