High CourtsDivision Bench(2022) 12 DEL CK 0032

Syed Jabir Ahamed vs Central Industrial Security Force

Delhi High Court · Decided on 5 December 2022

HON’BLE JUDGES
Suresh Kumar Kait, J · Neena Bansal Krishna, J
RESULT
Disposed Of
CASE NUMBER
Civil Writ Petition No. 16646 Of 2022, Civil Miscellaneous Application No. 52439-52440 Of 2022

CourtKutchehry membership

More clarity. Every judgment.

Download court copies, explore connected cases and make more of every research session.

Loading membership options…

Ask AI about this case

AI Structured Summary

Not yet generated for this judgment

Judgment

6 paragraphs · 256 words
1.

Vide the present petition, the petitioner is seeking quashing of order letter No.15014/12th R.B./Syed Jabir Ahamed/ANU/36/2020-5764 dated 21.10.2020 passed by Sr. Commandant, CISF, 12th R.B., Behror, Rajasthan (Disciplinary Authority); directions to the respondent Nos.1 to 3 to reinstate the petitioner in the job along with payment of arrears and back wages; quashing of the permanent order of disqualification for future employment under the Government passed by Sr. Commandant, CISF.

2.

Learned counsel for petitioner submits that vide order dated 21.10.2020 while dismissing the petitioner from service, it is mentioned in the said order that dismissal from service shall ordinarily be a disqualification for future employment of the petitioner under the Government with immediate effect.

3.

The grievance of the petitioner is that the said observation in the impugned order for future employment of the petitioner is interfering in getting employment in the private establishment.

4.

On perusal of the impugned order dated 21.10.2020, we find that in the said order it is clearly mentioned that the dismissal of the petitioner shall be a disqualification for future employment under the Government, however, nowhere it is mentioned that the petitioner is disqualified from getting the employment in private establishment.

5.

In view of above, it is made clear that since there is no such embargo on the petitioner vide the impugned order dated 21.10.2021 disqualifying him from getting future employment in private establishment, the petitioner is at liberty to take employment in the private establishment.

6.

Accordingly, the present petition and the pending applications stand disposed of.