High CourtsDivision Bench(1905) 01 MAD CK 0004

Syed Abdul Rahiman Sahib vs Govinda Padayachi and Others

Madras High Court · Decided on 18 January 1905 · Citation: (1905) 15 MLJ 406

HON’BLE JUDGES
Charles Arnold White, J

CourtKutchehry membership

More clarity. Every judgment.

Download court copies, explore connected cases and make more of every research session.

Loading membership options…

Ask AI about this case

AI Structured Summary

Not yet generated for this judgment

Judgment

8 paragraphs · 150 words

Charles Arnold White, Kt. C.J.

1.

Paragraph 9 in form No. 56 appended to the Civil Rules of Practice appears under the general heading "" conditions of the sale."" In my opinion

the paragraph is directory and cannot be said to be a condition of sale in the ordinary acceptation of the term.

2.

I do not think paragraph 10 applies to a case where a party fails to comply with the directions given in paragraph 9. If paragraph 9 was intended

to be anything more than the directory, I should be disposed to hold, it would be ultra vires as inconsistent with Section 312 of the Code of Civil

Procedure. Both paragraphs 9 and 10 have now been deleted from the form. I set aside the order cancelling the sale and directing the deposit to

be credited to Government.

3.

The case will go back to the District Munsiff.