High CourtsSingle Bench(2020) 12 KL CK 0363

Syam Kumar T.S And Anr vs State Of Kerala

High Court Of Kerala · Decided on 29 December 2020

HON’BLE JUDGES
K. Haripal, J
RESULT
Dismissed
CASE NUMBER
Bail Application No. 8269 Of 2020

CourtKutchehry membership

More clarity. Every judgment.

Download court copies, explore connected cases and make more of every research session.

Loading membership options…

Ask AI about this case

AI Structured Summary

Not yet generated for this judgment

Judgment

13 paragraphs · 265 words
1.

This is an application for anticipatory bail moved under Section 438 of the Code of Criminal Procedure.

2.

The petitioners are the first and third accused in Crime No.1246 of 2020 of Mathilakam Police Station registered alleging offence punishable under

Sections 341, 324, 294(b), 308 read with Section 34 of Indian Penal Code.

3.

The allegation is that the petitioners in furtherance of their common intention to attack the de facto complainant, on 08.11.2020 at 06.00 pm

assaulted the de facto complainant using an iron rod and caused him injuries. The place of the occurrence is near the Mathilakam Ayinikkal Temple.

4.

Heard the learned counsel for the petitioners and the learned Public Prosecutor.

5.

The allegation against the petitioners are serious in nature. It appears that they had, in furtherance of common intention, assaulted and injured the de

facto complainant using iron rod etc. and made attempts against his life. In the nature of the allegations, custodial interrogation of the petitioners

cannot be dispensed with. Having regard to the totality of the facts and circumstances of the case, I am not inclined to grant pre- arrest bail to the

petitioners. However, having regard to the submissions of the learned counsel, I deem it appropriate to dispose of the application permitting the

petitioners to surrender before the investigating officer within ten days from today and after interrogation, if arrested, they shall be produced before

the court on the same day and the Jurisdictional Magistrate will consider the feasibility of considering the application for bail with promptitude.

Subject to the above, the application is dismissed.